ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Finite Element Analysis to Study Tensile Strength Differences between Free and Attached Ear Lobules.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Finite element analysis and its application in Orthopaedics: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent ear lobule deformity is a chronic condition with aesthetic implications. The problem is normally addressed by certain improvisations of the traditional lobuloplasty technique. These include introduction of autologous tissue components like cartilage pieces to improve the structural integrity. Certain authors also advocate a different site for repiercing of the ear hole away from the lobuloplasty scar. Our study tries to understand the differences in the tensile strength between free and attached ear lobules, using finite element analysis. Eighteen healthy female volunteers with attached (eight subjects) and free ear lobules (10 subjects) were chosen, and the lobules were scanned using Artec 3D scanner. The model was then converted to free form or attached form (opposite to the form in which it was present originally) by decreasing or increasing the area of contact using geomagic software. Finite element analysis was then performed on both the models, and their yield max and, hence, the maximum load at the yield max at 0.7 strains according to previous studies were estimated and compared. The yield max and the corresponding load were found to be lesser in the free variety than in the attached variety. This experiment helps us to understand that when a structural difference in the ear lobule surgically may bring about a change in the tensile strength of the lobules. However, further clinical trials are required to clinically translate the same.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.