Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660059›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Finite Element Analysis to Study Tensile Strength Differences between Free and Attached Ear Lobules.

Madhubari Vathulya, Subrato Sarkar, Vaishali Verma, Indra Vir Singh, Pankaj Kandwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madhubari VathulyaDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Subrato SarkarDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.
Vaishali VermaMaveric Solution, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Indra Vir SinghDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.
Pankaj KandwalAIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences RishikeshIndian Institute of Technology Roorkee · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent ear lobule deformity is a chronic condition with aesthetic implications. The problem is normally addressed by certain improvisations of the traditional lobuloplasty technique. These include introduction of autologous tissue components like cartilage pieces to improve the structural integrity. Certain authors also advocate a different site for repiercing of the ear hole away from the lobuloplasty scar. Our study tries to understand the differences in the tensile strength between free and attached ear lobules, using finite element analysis. Eighteen healthy female volunteers with attached (eight subjects) and free ear lobules (10 subjects) were chosen, and the lobules were scanned using Artec 3D scanner. The model was then converted to free form or attached form (opposite to the form in which it was present originally) by decreasing or increasing the area of contact using geomagic software. Finite element analysis was then performed on both the models, and their yield max and, hence, the maximum load at the yield max at 0.7 strains according to previous studies were estimated and compared. The yield max and the corresponding load were found to be lesser in the free variety than in the attached variety. This experiment helps us to understand that when a structural difference in the ear lobule surgically may bring about a change in the tensile strength of the lobules. However, further clinical trials are required to clinically translate the same.

Identifiers

PMID36660059
PMCPMC9842249
OpenAlexW4317568238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.