ArticleMolecular syndromology2023
SLC26A2/DTDST Spectrum: A Cohort of 12 Patients Associated with a Comprehensive Review of the Genotype-Phenotype Correlation.
Article in Molecular syndromology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Skeletal Disorders with Defects in Glycosaminoglycan Biosynthesis.Molecular syndromology · 2026Review
- Genetics, epidemiology and management of clubfoot and related disorders.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Clinical and molecular characterization of chondrodysplasias in a cohort of Egyptian patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Substrate binding plasticity revealed by Cryo-EM structures of SLC26A2.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Role of gene interactions in the pathophysiology of skeletal dysplasias: A case report in Colombia.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Esophageal stenosis in an adult Mexican patient with diastrophic dysplasia: Case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pathogenic variants in the Methods: The local patients were genotyped by Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS). We reviewed data from the literature regarding phenotype, zygosity, and genotype in parallel. Results: The local cohort enrolled 12 patients, including one with a Desbuquois-like phenotype. All but one showed biallelic mutations, however, only one allele mutated in a fetus presenting ACG1B was identified. The literature review identified 42 articles and the analyses of genotype and zygosity included the 12 local patients. Discussion: The R279W variant was the most prevalent among the local patients. It was in homozygosity (hmz) in 2 patients with rMED and in compound heterozygosity (chtz) in 9 patients. The genotype and zygosity review of all patients led to the following conclusions: DTD is the most common phenotype in Finland due to a Finnish mutation (c.727-1G>C). Outside of Finland, rMED is the most prevalent phenotype, usually associated with R279W in hmz. In contrast, DTD's genotype is usually in chtz. Despite a large number of variants (38), just 8 are recurrent (R279W, C653S, c.-26+2T>C, R178*, K575Sfs*10, V340del, G663R, T512K). The last 3 in hmz lead to lethal phenotypes. The Finnish mutation is found only in chtz outside of Finland, being associated with all 4 classical phenotypes. The p.R178* and p.K575Sfs*10 variants should be viewed as lethal mutations since both were mainly described with lethal phenotypes and were never reported in hmz. The existence of 9 patients with only one mutated allele suggests that other mutations in the other allele of these patients still need to be unveiled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.