Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36660006›Full record

ArticleTranslational neuroscience2022

Fronto-parietal single-trial brain connectivity benefits successful memory recognition.

Soyeon Jun, Yihyun Joo, Youjin Sim, Chuyun Pyo, Keunsoo Ham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soyeon JunNeuroscience Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yihyun JooNational Forensic Services, Forensic Medical Examination Division, 10, Ipchun-ro, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26460, South Korea.
Youjin SimNational Forensic Services, Forensic Medical Examination Division, 10, Ipchun-ro, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26460, South Korea.
Chuyun PyoNational Forensic Services, Forensic Medical Examination Division, 10, Ipchun-ro, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26460, South Korea.
Keunsoo HamNational Forensic Services, Forensic Medical Examination Division, 10, Ipchun-ro, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26460, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful recognition has been known to produce distinct patterns of neural activity. Many studies have used spectral power or event-related potentials of single recognition-specific regions as classification features. However, this does not accurately reflect the mechanisms behind recognition, in that recognition requires multiple brain regions to work together. Hence, classification accuracy of subsequent memory performance could be improved by using functional connectivity within memory-related brain networks instead of using local brain activity as classifiers. In this study, we examined electroencephalography (EEG) signals while performing a word recognition memory task. Recorded EEG signals were collected using a 32-channel cap. Connectivity measures related to the left hemispheric fronto-parietal connectivity (P3 and F3) were found to contribute to the accurate recognition of previously studied memory items. Classification of subsequent memory outcome using connectivity features revealed that the classifier with support vector machine achieved the highest classification accuracy of 86.79 ± 5.93% (mean ± standard deviation) by using theta (3-8 Hz) connectivity during successful recognition trials. The results strongly suggest that highly accurate classification of subsequent memory outcome can be achieved by using single-trial functional connectivity.

Indexed as

brain connectivityEEGfronto-parietalmemorymutual informationrecognitiontheta

Identifiers

PMID36660006
PMCPMC9816457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.