ReviewBiophysical reviews2022
Advancing the field of computational drug design using multicanonical molecular dynamics-based dynamic docking.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stability-Driven Pose Prediction and Ligand Design via Contact Persistence Analysis from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Molecular recognition of natural compounds by MR1 and their implication in MAIT cell activation elucidated through McMD-based dynamic docking simulations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Antioxidant activity at the molecular level: exploring ways of action and computational tools to investigate them.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Protein Data Bank Japan: Computational Resources for Analysis of Protein Structures.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Familial Episodic Pain Syndrome: A Japanese Family Harboring the Novel Variant c.2431C>T (p.Leu811Phe) in SCN11A.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- Protein Data Bank Japan: Improved tools for sequence-oriented analysis of protein structures.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Structure-activity relationship of PET-degrading cutinase regulated by weak CaBiophysics and physicobiology · 2025Article
- Binding Mechanism of Riboswitch to Natural Ligand Elucidated by McMD-Based Dynamic Docking Simulations.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Benchmarking different docking protocols for predicting the binding poses of ligands complexed with cyclooxygenase enzymes and screening chemical libraries.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Article
- Elucidation of binding mechanism, affinity, and complex structure between mWT1 tumor-associated antigen peptide and HLA-A*24:02.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Mutual induced-fit mechanism drives binding between intrinsically disordered Bim and cryptic binding site of Bcl-xL.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Computational biophysics and structural biology of proteins-a Special Issue in honor of Prof. Haruki Nakamura's 70th birthday.Biophysical reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multicanonical molecular dynamics (McMD)-based dynamic docking is a powerful tool to not only predict the native binding configuration between two flexible molecules, but it can also be used to accurately simulate the binding/unbinding pathway. Furthermore, it can also predict alternative binding sites, including allosteric ones, by employing an exhaustive sampling approach. Since McMD-based dynamic docking accurately samples binding/unbinding events, it can thus be used to determine the molecular mechanism of binding between two molecules. We developed the McMD-based dynamic docking methodology based on the powerful, but woefully underutilized McMD algorithm, combined with a toolset to perform the docking and to analyze the results. Here, we showcase three of our recent works, where we have applied McMD-based dynamic docking to advance the field of computational drug design. In the first case, we applied our method to perform an exhaustive search between Hsp90 and one of its inhibitors to successfully predict the native binding configuration in its binding site, as we refined our analysis methods. For our second case, we performed an exhaustive search of two medium-sized ligands and Bcl-xL, which has a cryptic binding site that differs greatly between the apo and holo structures. Finally, we performed a dynamic docking simulation between a membrane-embedded GPCR molecule and a high affinity ligand that binds deep within its receptor's pocket. These advanced simulations showcase the power that the McMD-based dynamic docking method has, and provide a glimpse of the potential our methodology has to unravel and solve the medical and biophysical issues in the modern world. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12551-022-01010-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.