Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36659994›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2022

Protein folding problem: enigma, paradox, solution.

Alexei V Finkelstein, Natalya S Bogatyreva, Dmitry N Ivankov, Sergiy O Garbuzynskiy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Study of Ice-Binding Protein Oligomeric Complexes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. In silico evolution of globular protein folds from random sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Origins of Life: The Protein Folding Problem all over again?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexei V FinkelsteinInstitute of Protein Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-4803
Natalya S BogatyrevaInstitute of Protein Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia.
Dmitry N IvankovCenter of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205 Moscow, Russia.
Sergiy O GarbuzynskiyInstitute of Protein Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of protein chains to spontaneously form their three-dimensional structures is a long-standing mystery in molecular biology. The most conceptual aspect of this mystery is how the protein chain can find its native, "working" spatial structure (which, for not too big protein chains, corresponds to the global free energy minimum) in a biologically reasonable time, without exhaustive enumeration of all possible conformations, which would take billions of years. This is the so-called "Levinthal's paradox." In this review, we discuss the key ideas and discoveries leading to the current understanding of protein folding kinetics, including folding landscapes and funnels, free energy barriers at the folding/unfolding pathways, and the solution of Levinthal's paradox. A special role here is played by the "all-or-none" phase transition occurring at protein folding and unfolding and by the point of thermodynamic (and kinetic) equilibrium between the "native" and the "unfolded" phases of the protein chain (where the theory obtains the simplest form). The modern theory provides an understanding of key features of protein folding and, in good agreement with experiments, it (i) outlines the chain length-dependent range of protein folding times, (ii) predicts the observed maximal size of "foldable" proteins and domains. Besides, it predicts the maximal size of proteins and domains that fold under solely thermodynamic (rather than kinetic) control. Complementarily, a theoretical analysis of the number of possible protein folding patterns, performed at the level of formation and assembly of secondary structures, correctly outlines the upper limit of protein folding times.

Indexed as

“All-or-none” phase transitionFolding funnelFree energy landscapeLevinthal’s paradoxProtein 3D structureProtein folding

Identifiers

PMID36659994
PMCPMC9842845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.