Reflecting on mutational and biophysical analysis of

Nan Wu, Naohiro Kobayashi, Yutaka Kuroda, Toshio Yamazaki

Open access · greenAbstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

Hidden structural states of proteins revealed by conformer selection.Nature communications · 2026
Article
Identification of improved signal peptides for heterologous expression in Saccharomyces using a screen that exploits Gaussia luciferase.Scientific reports · 2025
Article
A Structural Model of Truncated Gaussia princeps Luciferase Elucidating the Crucial Catalytic Function of No.76 Arginine towards Coelenterazine Oxidation.PLoS computational biology · 2025
Article
Computational biophysics and structural biology of proteins-a Special Issue in honor of Prof. Haruki Nakamura's 70th birthday.Biophysical reviews · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nan Wu *College of Food and Bioengineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, 136 Kexue Road, Zhengzhou, 450001 People's Republic of China.

Naohiro Kobayashi *RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RSC, RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-Cho, Tsurumi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045 Japan.

Yutaka KurodaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakamachi, Koganei-Shi, Tokyo, 184-8588 Japan.

Toshio YamazakiRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RSC, RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-Cho, Tsurumi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045 Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4719-0828

RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPZhengzhou University of Light Industry · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12551-022-01025-6.

Indexed as

BioluminescenceDynamic structureIntrinsically disordered region (IDR)NMR

Identifiers

PMID36659992

DOI10.1007/s12551-022-01025-6

PMCPMC9842821

OpenAlexW4311368900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.