ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2023
Valproic acid as a radio-sensitizer in glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics based and AI-driven drug repositioning for epigenetic therapy in female malignancies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Levetiracetam and valproic acid in glioma: antiseizure and potential antineoplastic effects.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Electrophysiology of gliomas: current science, implications, and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Optimization, Characterization, and Comparison of Two Luciferase-Expressing Mouse Glioblastoma Models.Cancers · 2024Article
- Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Valproic acid in glioma: Will the anticancer issue ever be solved?Neuro-oncology practice · 2023Article
- The function of histone methylation and acetylation regulators in GBM pathophysiology.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Antiepileptic drugs in glioblastoma survival: dichotomic or treatment and mechanism of action-dependent variable?Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) including valproic acid (VPA) have the potential to improve radiotherapy (RT) efficacy and reduce treatment adverse events (AE) via epigenetic modification and radio-sensitization of neoplastic cells. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and AE associated with HDACi used as radio-sensitizers in adult solid organ malignancy patients. Methods: A systematic review utilized electronic searches of MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase(Ovid), The Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify studies examining the efficacy and AEs associated with HDACi treatment in solid organ malignancy patients undergoing RT. Meta-analysis was performed with overall survival (OS) reported as hazard ratios (HR) as the primary outcome measure. OS reported as median survival difference, and AEs were secondary outcome measures. Results: Ten studies reporting on the efficacy and/or AEs of HDACi in RT-treated solid organ malignancy patients met inclusion criteria. All included studies focused on HDACi valproic acid (VPA) in high-grade glioma patients, of which 9 studies ( Conclusions: This review suggests that glioma patients undergoing RT may experience prolonged survival due to HDACi VPA administration. Further randomized controlled trials are required to validate these findings. Additionally, more research into the use of HDACi radio-adjuvant treatment in non-glioma solid organ malignancies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.