Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36659972›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2023

Incidence and survival of choroid plexus tumors in the United States.

Kailey Takaoka, Gino Cioffi, Kristin A Waite, Jonathan L Finlay, Daniel Landi, Kaitlyn Greppin, Carol Kruchko, Quinn T Ostrom, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Choroid plexus tumors in adults: a retrospective mono-institutional study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Choroid Plexus Pathophysiology.Annual review of pathology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Pediatric-Like Brain Tumors in Adults.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kailey TakaokaScience Research & Engineering Program, Hathaway Brown School, Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA.
Gino CioffiTrans Divisional Research Program (TDRP), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-8652
Kristin A WaiteTrans Divisional Research Program (TDRP), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-8510
Jonathan L FinlayPediatrics and Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Daniel LandiThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kaitlyn GreppinScience Research & Engineering Program, Hathaway Brown School, Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA.
Carol KruchkoCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-035X
Quinn T OstromCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-7558
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanTrans Divisional Research Program (TDRP), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6190-9304
Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States · USDuke University · USShaker Heights Public Library · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

General Studies of EpidemiologyZIACP010167 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KRAFT, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$9.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are limited data available on incidence and survival of patients with choroid plexus tumors (CPT). This study provides the most current epidemiological analysis of choroid plexus tumors from 2004 to 2017 in the United States. Methods: Data on 2013 patients with CPT were acquired from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Cancer Institute, from 2004 to 2017. CPT cases were classified by the following pathological subtypes: choroid plexus papilloma (CPP), atypical choroid plexus papilloma (aCPP), and choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC). Frequencies and age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR) per 100 000 and rate ratios per 100 000 (IRR) were reported for age, sex, race, and ethnicity for each pathological subtype with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Using CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries survival database, survival curves and hazard ratios (HRs) evaluated overall survival from 2001 to 2016. Results: CPP had the highest overall incidence (AAIR: 0.034, 95% CI: 0.033-0.036), followed by CPC (AAIR: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.008-0.009) and aCPP (AAIR: 0.005, 95% CI: 0.005-0.006). Incidence was highest among children less than one year old among all subtypes (CPP AAIR: 0.278; aCPP AAIR: 0.140; CPC AAIR: 0.195), reducing as patients aged. Overall survival was worse among patients with CPC, being five times more likely to die compared to patients with CPP (HR: 5.23, 95% CI: 4.05-7.54, Conclusions: This analysis is the most current and comprehensive study in the US on the incidence and survival for CPT. Population based statistics provide critical information in understanding disease characteristics, which impact patient care and prognosis.

Indexed as

brain tumorschoroid plexusepidemiologyincidencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID36659972
PMCPMC9837781
OpenAlexW4289667331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.