Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36659941›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023

Safety profile of 0.0015% tafluprost eye drops in China: a post-marketing observational study.

Xue-Li Chen, Yan-Jing Fu, Bo Qu, Ye-Wei Wang, Xin Tang, Yu-Hong Wang, Guo-Yi Zhou, Ming-Kai Lin, Jing-Yuan Shen, Jin Yao and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Xue-Li ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200000, China.
Yan-Jing FuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Daqing Ophthalmologic Hospital, Daqing 163000, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Bo QuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110000, Liaoning Province, China.
Ye-Wei WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Da Lian He Eye Specialist Hospital, Dalian 116000, Liaoning Province, China.
Xin TangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing 100000, China.
Yu-Hong WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China.
Guo-Yi ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yueqing People's Hospital, Wenzhou 325600, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ming-Kai LinDepartment of Glaucoma, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China.
Jing-Yuan ShenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shengzhou Shen's Eye Hospital, Shaoxing 312400, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jin YaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Su-Yan LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xuzhou No.1 Peoples Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Miao-Qin WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Hua-Zong PengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wuhan Eyegood Ophthalmic Hospital, Wuhan 430014, Hubei Province, China.
Ming-Ying LaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen 518001, Guangdong Province, China.
Ren-Yi WuDepartment of Glaucoma, Shanghai Heping Eye Hospital, Shanghai 200000, China.
Yi-Nong ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China.
Xiao-Jun WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong Province, China.
Ming-Chang ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China.
Su-Ping GuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shengyang He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110000, Liaoning Province, China.
Xing-Huai SunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200000, China.
He Eye Hospital · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNXiamen University · CNAnshan Hospital · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CNKunming Medical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNWuhan Union Hospital · CNXian Yang Central Hospital · CNXuzhou Medical College · CNYueqing People's Hospital · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the treatment pattern and safety of tafluprost for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH) in clinical practice in China.

methodsThis post-marketing observational study included patients who received tafluprost to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) within 30d between September 2017 and March 2020 in 20 hospitals in China. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during tafluprost treatment and within 30d after the treatment were collected.

resultsA total of 2544 patients were included in this study, of them 58.5% (1488/2544) had primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 21.9% (556/2544) had OH and 19.7% (500/2544) used tafluprost for other reasons. Of 359 ADRs occurred in 10.1% (258/2544) patients, and no serious adverse event occurred. The most common ADR was conjunctival hyperemia (128 ADRs in 124 patients, 4.9%). Totally 1670 participants (65.6%) combined tafluprost with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs; 37.1%, 620/1670), sympathomimetics (33.5%, 559/1670), β-blockers (33.2%, 555/1670), other prostaglandin analogs (PGAs; 15.6%, 260/1670) and other eye drops (15.1%, 253/1670). The highest incidence of conjunctival hyperemia was noted in patients who received tafluprost in combination with other PGAs (23 ADRs in 23 patients, 8.8%, 23/260) and the lowest was in combination with CAIs (16 ADRs in 16 patients, 2.6%, 16/620). Tafluprost was applied in primary angle-closure glaucoma (41.6%, 208/500), after glaucoma surgery (17.8%, 89/500) and after non-glaucoma surgery (15.8%, 79/500).

conclusionTafluprost is safe for POAG and OH, and tolerable when combined with other eye drops and under various clinical circumstances.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsglaucomaintraocular pressureocular hypertensiontafluprost

Identifiers

PMID36659941
PMCPMC9815987
OpenAlexW4313416464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.