ArticleBiophysical journal2023
Fluorescence lifetime: Beating the IRF and interpulse window.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resolving fluorescently labeled species using highly multiplexed spectral FLIM.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Simultaneous particle tracking, phase retrieval and point spread function reconstruction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Building Fluorescence Lifetime Maps Photon-by-Photon by Leveraging Spatial Correlations.ACS photonics · 2023Article
- Article
- Probing organoid metabolism using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM): The next frontier of drug discovery and disease understanding.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Single-photon smFRET. I: Theory and conceptual basis.Biophysical reports · 2023Article
- Single-photon smFRET. III. Application to pulsed illumination.Biophysical reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence lifetime imaging captures the spatial distribution of chemical species across cellular environments employing pulsed illumination confocal setups. However, quantitative interpretation of lifetime data continues to face critical challenges. For instance, fluorescent species with known in vitro excited-state lifetimes may split into multiple species with unique lifetimes when introduced into complex living environments. What is more, mixtures of species, which may be both endogenous and introduced into the sample, may exhibit 1) very similar lifetimes as well as 2) wide ranges of lifetimes including lifetimes shorter than the instrumental response function or whose duration may be long enough to be comparable to the interpulse window. By contrast, existing methods of analysis are optimized for well-separated and intermediate lifetimes. Here, we broaden the applicability of fluorescence lifetime analysis by simultaneously treating unknown mixtures of arbitrary lifetimes-outside the intermediate, Goldilocks, zone-for data drawn from a single confocal spot leveraging the tools of Bayesian nonparametrics (BNP). We benchmark our algorithm, termed BNP lifetime analysis, using a range of synthetic and experimental data. Moreover, we show that the BNP lifetime analysis method can distinguish and deduce lifetimes using photon counts as small as 500.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.