Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36659850›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Fluorescence lifetime: Beating the IRF and interpulse window.

Mohamadreza Fazel, Alexander Vallmitjana, Lorenzo Scipioni, Enrico Gratton, Michelle A Digman, Steve Pressé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamadreza FazelCenter for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Alexander VallmitjanaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California; Laboratory of Fluorescence Dynamics, The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.
Lorenzo ScipioniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California; Laboratory of Fluorescence Dynamics, The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.
Enrico GrattonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California; Laboratory of Fluorescence Dynamics, The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.
Michelle A DigmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California; Laboratory of Fluorescence Dynamics, The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.
Steve PresséCenter for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; School of Molecular Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Electronic address: spresse@asu.edu.

Funding

TRD4: Phasor analysisP41GM103540 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GRATTON, ENRICO · 2012 to 2020
$12.5M
A Bayesian nonparametric approach to superresolved tracking of multiple molecules inside living cellsR01GM130745 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Theoretical Models of Single Molecule Dynamics from Minimal Photon NumbersR01GM134426 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103540NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence lifetime imaging captures the spatial distribution of chemical species across cellular environments employing pulsed illumination confocal setups. However, quantitative interpretation of lifetime data continues to face critical challenges. For instance, fluorescent species with known in vitro excited-state lifetimes may split into multiple species with unique lifetimes when introduced into complex living environments. What is more, mixtures of species, which may be both endogenous and introduced into the sample, may exhibit 1) very similar lifetimes as well as 2) wide ranges of lifetimes including lifetimes shorter than the instrumental response function or whose duration may be long enough to be comparable to the interpulse window. By contrast, existing methods of analysis are optimized for well-separated and intermediate lifetimes. Here, we broaden the applicability of fluorescence lifetime analysis by simultaneously treating unknown mixtures of arbitrary lifetimes-outside the intermediate, Goldilocks, zone-for data drawn from a single confocal spot leveraging the tools of Bayesian nonparametrics (BNP). We benchmark our algorithm, termed BNP lifetime analysis, using a range of synthetic and experimental data. Moreover, we show that the BNP lifetime analysis method can distinguish and deduce lifetimes using photon counts as small as 500.

Indexed as

Coloring AgentsBayes TheoremFluorescenceMicroscopy, FluorescenceColoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID36659850
PMCPMC9989884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.