Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36659820›Full record

ArticleJournal of telemedicine and telecare2024

Perceived barriers and facilitators to the adoption of telemedicine infectious diseases consultations in southeastern Missouri hospitals.

Thabani Nyoni, Emily C Evers, Maria Pérez, Donna B Jeffe, Stephanie A Fritz, Graham A Colditz, Jason P Burnham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Open forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thabani NyoniBrown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Emily C EversBrown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Maria PérezDivision of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Donna B JeffeDivision of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7642-3777
Stephanie A FritzDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jason P BurnhamDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-3006

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTelemedicine infectious diseases consultations (tele-ID consults) improves access to healthcare for underserved/resource-limited communities. However, factors promoting or hindering implementation of tele-ID consults in low-resource settings are understudied. This study sought to fill this gap by describing perceived barriers and facilitators tele-ID consults at three rural hospitals in southeastern Missouri.

methodsTwelve in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposively sampled group of information-rich hospital stakeholders from three rural, southeastern Missouri hospitals with partial or no on-site availability of ID physicians. Our literature-informed interview guide elicited participants' knowledge and experience with tele-ID consults, perceptions on ID consultation needs, and perceived barriers to and facilitators of tele-ID consults. Interview transcripts were coded using an iterative process of inductive analysis to identify core themes related to barriers and facilitators.

resultsPerceived barriers to adopting and implementing tele-ID consults included logistical challenges, technology and devices, negative emotional responses, patient-related factors, concerns about reduced quality of care when using telemedicine, lack of acceptance or buy-in from physicians or staff, and legal concerns. Key facilitators included perceived need, perceived benefits to patients and physicians, flexibility and openness to change among staff members and patients, telemedicine champions, prior experiences, and enthusiasm. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that rural hospitals need tele-ID consults and have the capacity to implement tele-ID consults, but operational and technical feasibility challenges remain. Adoption and implementation of tele-ID consults may reduce ID-physician shortage-related service gaps by permitting ID physician's greater geographic reach.

Indexed as

Remote ConsultationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicable DiseasesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, RuralHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMissouriQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationTelemedicineadoptionbarriersfacilitatorsimplementationinfectious diseases consultationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36659820
PMCPMC10354216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.