Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658618›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2023

Using Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis to improve safety in the cancer treatment prescription and administration process.

Alessandra Buja, Giuseppe De Luca, Ketti Ottolitri, Elena Marchi, Francesco Paolo De Siena, Giovanni Leone, Pietro Maculan, Umberto Bolzonella, Riccardo Caberlotto, Giovanni Cappella and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proactive risk assessment and nursing risk management in chemotherapy drugs: FMECA methodology results.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Alessandra BujaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy. alessandra.buja@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-3807
Giuseppe De LucaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Ketti OttolitriVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Elena MarchiVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Francesco Paolo De SienaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni LeoneDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Pietro MaculanDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Umberto BolzonellaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Riccardo CaberlottoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni CappellaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Giulia GrottoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Gaia LattavoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Benedetta SforziDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni VenturatoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Anna Maria SaievaVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministering cancer drugs is a high-risk process, and mistakes can have fatal consequences. Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is a widely recognized method for identifying and preventing potential risks, applied in various settings, including healthcare. The aim of this study was to recognize potential failures in cancer treatment prescription and administration, with a view to enabling the adoption of measures to prevent them.

methodsThis study consists of a FMECA. A team of resident doctors in public health at the University of Padua examined the cancer chemotherapy process with the support of a multidisciplinary team from the Veneto Institute of Oncology (an acknowledged comprehensive cancer center), and two other provincial hospitals. A diagram was drafted to illustrate 9 different phases of chemotherapy, from the adoption of a treatment plan to its administration, and to identify all possible failure modes. Criticality was ascertained by rating severity, frequency and likelihood of a failure being detected, using adapted versions of already published scales. Safety strategies were identified and summarized.

resultsTwenty-two failure modes came to light, distributed over the various phases of the cancer treatment process, and seven of them were classified as high risk. All phases of the cancer chemotherapy process were defined as potentially critical and at least one action was identified for a single high-risk failure mode. To reduce the likelihood of the cause, or to improve the chances of a failure mode being detected, a total of 10 recommendations have been identified.

conclusionsFMECA can be useful for identifying potential failures in a process considered to be at high risk. Safety strategies were devised for each high-risk failure mode identified.

Indexed as

Cancer treatmentChemotherapy administrationPatient safetyProactive management

Identifiers

PMID36658618
PMCPMC9851104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.