ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2023
The performance of EuroSCORE II in CABG patients in relation to sex, age, and surgical risk: a nationwide study in 14,118 patients.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07598682 (Early Postoperative Trajectory-Based Phenotyping Improves Risk Stratification Beyond EuroSCORE in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Postoperative Trajectory-Based Phenotyping Improves Risk Stratification Beyond EuroSCORE in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide as a Prognostic Biomarker for Cardiac Surgeries: A Systematic Review.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and risk factors of frailty among cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Therapeutic Efficacy of Sivelestat Sodium in ARDS Following Aortic Dissection: A Pilot Physiological Trial with Exploratory Transcriptomic Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Trial
- Dynamic Perioperative Risk Stratification of In-Hospital Mortality After Elective Isolated On-Pump CABG: A Single-Center Firth Penalized Logistic Regression Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Hospital Length of Stay After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Perioperative Characteristics and Postoperative Complication Burden.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Preoperative Naples Prognostic Score and outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Refitting EuroSCORE II for 120-Day Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Nationwide Registry Data.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Prediction of mortality based on the EuroSCORE II model in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2025Article
- The Role of EuroSCORE II in Predicting Postoperative Pressure Injuries in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Five-Year Mortality of Patients with Perioperative Myocardial Infarction After On-Pump Isolated or Combined Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Short-Term Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Performance of the EuroSCORE in coronary artery bypass graft in Colombia, a middle-income country: A retrospective cohort.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Enhancing mortality prediction after coronary artery bypass graft: a machine learning approach utilizing EuroScore.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Simultaneous Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Urgent Patients: A Single Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Performance of EuroSCORE II in Octogenarians Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery (from the KROK Registry).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in septuagenarians.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Long-term mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and risk factors for mortality.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- A narrative review of vascular conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting.Cell transplantationReview
- Contemporary risk models for infective endocarditis surgery: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo determine the discriminative accuracy and calibration of EuroSCORE II in relation to age, sex, and surgical risk in a large nationwide coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) cohort.
methodsAll 14,118 patients undergoing isolated CABG in Sweden during 2012-2017 were included. Individual patient data were taken from the SWEDEHEART registry. Patients were divided by age (< 60, 60-69, 70-79, ≥ 80 years), sex, and surgical risk (low: EuroSCORE < 4%, intermediate: 4-8%, high: > 8%). Discriminative accuracy was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration by the observed/estimated (O/E) mortality ratio at 30 days.
resultsAUC and O/E ratio were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.85) and 0.58 (0.50-0.66) overall, 0.82 (0.79-0.86) and 0.57 (0.48-0.66) in men, and 0.79 (0.73-0.85) and 0.60 (0.47-0.75) in women. Regarding age, discriminative accuracy was highest in patients aged 60-69 years (AUC: 0.86 [0.80-0.93]) but was satisfactory in all groups (AUC: 0.74-0.80). O/E ratio varied from 0.26 for patients > 60 years to 0.90 for patients > 80 years. Regarding surgical risk, AUC and O/E ratio were 0.63 (0.44-0.83) and 0.18 (0.09-0.30) in low-risk patients, 0.60 (0.55-0.66) and 0.57 (0.46-0.68) in intermediate-risk patients, and 0.78 (0.73-0.83) and 0.78 (0.64-0.92) in high-risk patients.
conclusionsEuroSCORE II had good discriminative accuracy independently of sex and age, but markedly overestimated mortality risk, especially in younger patients. Accuracy and calibration were better in high-risk patients than in low-risk and intermediate-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.