ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
The classification of flash visual evoked potential based on deep learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of smooth OWA operators to classification of retinitis pigmentosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based analysis of visual electrophysiological signals for clinical interpretation support.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVisual electrophysiology is an objective visual function examination widely used in clinical work and medical identification that can objectively evaluate visual function and locate lesions according to waveform changes. However, in visual electrophysiological examinations, the flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) varies greatly among individuals, resulting in different waveforms in different normal subjects. Moreover, most of the FVEP wave labelling is performed automatically by a machine, and manually corrected by professional clinical technicians. These labels may have biases due to the individual variations in subjects, incomplete clinical examination data, different professional skills, personal habits and other factors. Through the retrospective study of big data, an artificial intelligence algorithm is used to maintain high generalization abilities in complex situations and improve the accuracy of prescreening.
methodsA novel multi-input neural network based on convolution and confidence branching (MCAC-Net) for retinitis pigmentosa RP recognition and out-of-distribution detection is proposed. The MCAC-Net with global and local feature extraction is designed for the FVEP signal that has different local and global information, and a confidence branch is added for out-of-distribution sample detection. For the proposed manual features,a new input layer is added.
resultsThe model is verified by a clinically collected FVEP dataset, and an accuracy of 90.7% is achieved in the classification task and 93.3% in the out-of-distribution detection task.
conclusionWe built a deep learning-based FVEP classification algorithm that promises to be an excellent tool for screening RP diseases by using FVEP signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.