Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658544›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2023

Stakeholder views on informed consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa.

Francis Masiye, Walter Jaoko, Stuart Rennie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francis MasiyeMalawi University of Science and Technology, Ndata Farm, Thyolo, Malawi. fmasiye@must.ac.mw.
Walter JaokoCentre for Medical Ethics and Law, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stuart RennieCentre for Medical Ethics and Law, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Advancing Research Ethics Training in Southern Africa (ARESA): Leadership ProgramD43TW010511 · FIC · STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY · PI MOODLEY, KEYMANTHRI, RENNIE, STUART · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
Community Engagement for H3Africa Biobanking Research: The Tygerberg ModelU01HG008222 · NHGRI · STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY · PI MOODLEY, KEYMANTHRI · 2015 to 2017
$205k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010511FIC NIH HHS D43 TW01511-01NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent advances in biomedical research have introduced new ethical challenges in obtaining informed consent in low and middle-income settings. For example, there are controversies about the use of broad consent in the collection of biological samples for use in future biomedical research. However, few studies have explored preferred informed consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa. Therefore, we conducted an empirical study to understand preferred consent models among key stakeholders in biomedical studies that involve collection of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa. The main objective of the study was to explore views of key stakeholders on current policies on informed consent in Malawi and South Africa.

methodsThis was a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Thirty-four in-depth interviews and 6 focus group discussions were conducted with REC members, Funders, Policymakers, CAB members and Research Participants in Malawi and South Africa to gather their views on models of informed consent. The study was conducted in Cape Town, South Africa, and Blantyre and Lilongwe in Malawi.

resultsMost key stakeholders preferred broad consent and tiered consent to specific consent. Some participants expressed a strong preference for specific consent to other models of informed consent in biomedical research. Few participants did not have any preference for a consent model, opting for any consent model which provides adequate information about the proposed research and what their national consent regulations require. Finally, very few participants preferred blanket consent to other informed consent models.

conclusionsThis study aimed to help fill the gap in the scientific literature on key stakeholder views on consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa. The findings of the study have provided some evidence that may support policies on permissible consent models for future use of biological samples in sub-Saharan Africa considering the differences in informed consent regulations and guidelines. Finally, the findings can inform ongoing discussions on permissible consent models to be used for future use of biological samples.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchResearch SubjectsHumansInformed ConsentMalawiQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaBroad consentFocus group discussion and in-depth interviewInformed consentSpecific consentTiered consent

Identifiers

PMID36658544
PMCPMC9854061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.