Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658540›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study.

Miao Zheng, Yanan Wan, Gongwen Liu, Yan Gao, Xiaoqun Pan, Wanxi You, Donglan Yuan, Jianxin Shen, Junhua Lu, Xia Wang and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Miao Zheng *The Osteoporosis Clinical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China.
Yanan Wan *Department of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Control, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Gongwen Liu *Department of Orthopedics, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, 215004, China.
Yan GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The First People's Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, 215300, China.
Xiaoqun PanDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Control, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Wanxi YouDepartment of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Luhe District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 215200, China.
Donglan YuanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Jianxin ShenDepartment of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Suzhou Wujiang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Suzhou, 215200, China.
Junhua LuDepartment of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Chongchuan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, 226001, China.
Xia WangDepartment of Osteoporosis, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, China.
Gangfeng ZhengDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Jingjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jingjiang 214500, Beijing, China.
Zhiqiang HanTaizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou, 225300, China.
Xinlin LiDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Nantong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, 214500, China.
Kai ChenXuYi People's Hospital, Huaian, 211700, China.
Xiaoxi XingQuanshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, 221002, China.
Dong ZhangThe Osteoporosis Clinical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China.
Chengwei WengThe Osteoporosis Clinical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China.
Qi WeiThe Osteoporosis Clinical Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China. weiqisahsu@outlook.com.
Yongqing ZhangDepartment of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease Control, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, 210009, China. zyq6943@163.com.
Hua LinDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China. lh2116@126.com.
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNHuaian First People’s Hospital · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNJiangsu University · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control And Prevention · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNational Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention · CNSoochow University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNWuxi Third People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone mineral density (BMD) and prevalence of osteoporosis may differ between urban and rural populations. This study aimed to investigate the differences in BMD characteristics between urban and rural populations in Jiangsu, China.

methodsA total of 2,711 participants aged 20 years and older were included in the cross-sectional study. Multistage and stratified cluster random sampling was used as the sampling strategy. BMD was measured by the method of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data were collected through questionnaires/interview. BMD values at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, total hip, and greater trochanter were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the characteristics of urban and rural participants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the factors that may be associated with osteoporosis in urban and rural populations.

resultsOf these participants, 1,540 (50.49%) were females and 1,363 (42.14%) were from urban. The prevalence of osteoporosis in urban and rural populations was 5.52% and 10.33%, respectively. In terms of gender, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 2.68% in males and 13.82% in females. For menopausal status, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 30.34% in postmenopausal females and 4.78% in premenopausal females. In urban populations, older age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.36, 95%CI, 2.35-2.36), hypertension (AOR = 1.37, 95%CI, 1.36-1.37), unmarried (AOR = 4.04, 95%CI, 3.99-4.09), smoking everyday (AOR = 2.26, 95%CI, 2.23-2.28), family history of osteoporosis (AOR = 1.66, 95%CI, 1.65-1.67), dyslipidemia (AOR = 1.05, 95%CI, 1.04-1.05), and higher β-crosslaps (β-CTX) level (AOR = 1.02, 95%CI, 1.02-1.02) were associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, while males (AOR = 0.04, 95%CI, 0.04-0.04), higher education level (AOR = 0.95, 95%CI, 0.95-0.95), and aquatic product intake (AOR = 0.99, 95%CI, 0.99-0.99) were related to decreased risk of osteoporosis. Similar results were also observed in rural populations, and (all P < 0.05).

conclusionThe prevalence of osteoporosis in rural populations was higher than that in urban populations, and the factors associated with the risk of osteoporosis were similar in urban and rural populations.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsRural PopulationInfluencing factorOsteoporosisPrevalenceUrban and rural

Identifiers

PMID36658540
PMCPMC9850530
OpenAlexW4317425922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.