Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658520›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Pandemic preparedness and management in European out-of-hours primary care services - a descriptive study.

Ingrid Keilegavlen Rebnord, Guri Rortveit, Linda Huibers, Jonas Nordvik Dale, Marleen Smits, Tone Morken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ingrid Keilegavlen RebnordDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen , Norway. ingrid.rebnord@uib.no.
Guri RortveitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen , Norway.
Linda HuibersResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jonas Nordvik DaleNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Marleen SmitsScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tone MorkenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
NORCE Research AS · NOAarhus University · DKRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Trond Mohn stiftelse TMS2020TMT06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is the first point of contact for all acute health problems. As such, primary care was at the frontline in the COVID-19 pandemic, playing a significant role in clinical responses and information to the public. This study aimed to describe the variations in patient management strategies used in the out-of-hours services in different European countries during the first phase of the pandemic.

methodWe conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey in August 2020, selecting key informants from European countries using European networks. The questionnaire was developed in collaboration with researchers in the field of out-of-hours primary care. We performed descriptive analyses per region, structuring results into themes.

resultsKey informants from 38 regions in 20 European countries responded. Seven regions reported that their out-of-hours services had a pandemic preparedness plan, three had trained on the plan, and two had stockpiles of personal protection equipment before the outbreak. Extension of telephone triage lines and establishment of local infection-control teams and clinics were the main patient management strategies. Other strategies for patient contacts were also used in the regions, such as video-consultations (13 regions), electronic consultations (21 regions), patient's car as alternative waiting room (19 regions), outside tents for testing (24 regions), "drive-through" testing (26 regions), and separate departments for infected patients (14 regions).

conclusionFew out-of-hours services were well prepared for a pandemic, but all expanded and reorganized rapidly, adopting new strategies for patient management and treatment. The results could be useful for planning of organization preparedness of out-of-hours primary care service for future pandemics.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareCOVID-19Emergency primary careOut-of-hours Medical CarePandemicPreparednessPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID36658520
PMCPMC9849833
OpenAlexW4317388234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.