Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658511›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

The feasibility of implementing a cultural mentoring program alongside pain management and physical rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: results of a controlled before-and-after pilot study.

Bernadette Brady, Balwinder Sidhu, Matthew Jennings, Robert Boland, Geraldine Hassett, Lucy Chipchase, Clarice Tang, Sylvia Yaacoub, Natalie Pavlovic, Samia Sayad and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Creating safer cancer care with ethnic minority patients: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of cancer service staff.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette BradyLiverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103 Liverpool, BC, Sydney, NSW, 1871, Australia. Bernadette.brady@health.nsw.gov.au.
Balwinder SidhuMulticultural Health Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, 5/39 Stanley Street, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia.
Matthew JenningsLiverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103 Liverpool, BC, Sydney, NSW, 1871, Australia.
Robert BolandSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Geraldine HassettLiverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103 Liverpool, BC, Sydney, NSW, 1871, Australia.
Lucy ChipchaseCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Clarice TangSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Sylvia YaacoubFairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 5, Fairfield, Sydney, NSW, 1851, Australia.
Natalie PavlovicFairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 5, Fairfield, Sydney, NSW, 1851, Australia.
Samia SayadFairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 5, Fairfield, Sydney, NSW, 1851, Australia.
Toni AndaryFairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 5, Fairfield, Sydney, NSW, 1851, Australia.
Shaniya OgulFairfield Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, PO Box 5, Fairfield, Sydney, NSW, 1851, Australia.
Justine NaylorSouth Western Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
South Western Sydney Local Health District · AUFairfield Hospital · AULiverpool Hospital · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulturally diverse communities face barriers managing chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions including navigation challenges, sub-optimal healthcare provider engagement and difficulty adopting self-management behaviours.

objectivesTo explore the feasibility and trends of effectiveness of implementing a cultural mentoring program alongside clinical service delivery.

methodsThis quasi-experimental controlled before-and-after multiple case study was conducted in three hospital-based services that provide treatment for patients with musculoskeletal pain. Two prospective cohorts, a pre-implementation and a post-implementation cohort, of adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain who attended during the 6-month recruitment phase, were eligible if they self-identified with one of the cultures prioritised for mentoring by the clinic. The pre-implementation cohort received routine care for up to 3-months, while the post-implementation cohort received up to 3-months of cultural mentoring integrated into routine care (3 to 10 sessions), provided by a consumer (n = 6) with lived experience. Feasibility measures (recruitment and completion rates, attendance, satisfaction), and trends of effectiveness (Patient Activation Measure and Health Literacy Questionnaire items one and six) were collated over 3-months for both cohorts. Outcomes were presented descriptively and analysed using Mann-Whitney U-tests for between-group comparisons. Translation and transcription of post-treatment semi-structured interviews allowed both cohorts' perspectives of treatment to be analysed using a Rapid Assessment Process.

resultsThe cultural mentor program was feasible to implement in clinical services with comparable recruitment rates (66% pre-implementation; 61% post-implementation), adequate treatment attendance (75% pre-implementation; 89% post-implementation), high treatment satisfaction (97% pre-implementation; 96% post-implementation), and minimal participant drop-out (< 5%). Compared to routine care (n = 71), patients receiving mentoring (n = 55) achieved significantly higher Patient Activation Measure scores (median change 0 vs 10.3 points, p < 0.01) at 3-months, while Health Literacy Questionnaire items did not change for either cohort over time. Three themes underpinned participant experiences and acceptability of the mentoring intervention: 'expectational priming', 'lived expertise' and 'collectivist orientation' to understand shared participant experiences and explore the potential differential effect of the mentoring intervention.

conclusionParticipant experiences and observations of improved patient activation provide support for the acceptability of the mentoring intervention integrated into routine care. These results support the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial, while also exploring issues of scalability and sustainability.

Indexed as

MentoringMusculoskeletal PainAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansMentorsPain ManagementPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCulturally and linguistically diverseCultural mentorFeasibilityNatural helperPatient activation

Identifiers

PMID36658511
PMCPMC9850562
OpenAlexW4317435201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.