Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658509›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Benefits and barriers of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: perspectives of obstetric doctors from a Ghanaian tertiary hospital.

Namratha Atluri, Titus K Beyuo, Samuel A Oppong, Sarah D Compton, Cheryl A Moyer, Emma R Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Namratha AtluriUniversity of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St, MI, 48109, Ann Arbor, USA.
Titus K BeyuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, P.O. Box 4236, Ghana. drbeyuo@gmail.com.
Samuel A OppongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, P.O. Box 4236, Ghana.
Sarah D ComptonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cheryl A MoyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Emma R LawrenceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING IN HEALTH PROF SCHOOLST35HL007690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAHERTY, KEVIN R · 1990 to 2024
$3.3M
Home blood pressure monitoring among women at risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in GhanaK01TW012166 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Emma Rachel Lawrence · 2022 to 2026
$983k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW012166NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed diagnosis of preeclampsia contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality. Patient-performed home blood pressure monitoring facilitates more frequent monitoring and earlier diagnosis. However, challenges may exist to implementation in low- and middle income-countries.

methodsThis cross-sectional mixed methods study evaluated obstetric doctors' perspectives on the benefits of and barriers to the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana. Participants were doctors providing obstetric care at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. Electronic surveys were completed by 75 participants (response rate 49.3%), consisting of demographics and questions on attitudes and perceived benefits and challenges of home BP monitoring. Semi-structured interviews were completed by 22 participants to expand on their perspectives.

resultsQuantitative and qualitative results converged to highlight that the current state of blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana is inadequate. The majority agreed that delayed diagnosis of preeclampsia leads to poor health outcomes in their patients (90.6%, n = 68) and earlier detection would improve outcomes (98.7%, n = 74). Key qualitative benefits to the adoption of home blood pressure monitoring were patient empowerment and trust of diagnosis, more quantity and quality of blood pressure data, and improvement in systems-level efficiency. The most significant barriers were the cost of monitors, lack of a communication system to convey abnormal values, and low health literacy. Overall, doctors felt that most barriers could be overcome with patient education and counseling, and that benefits far outweighed barriers. The majority of doctors (81.3%, n = 61), would use home BP data to inform their clinical decisions and 89% (n = 67) would take immediate action based on elevated home BP values. 91% (n = 68) would recommend home BP monitoring to their pregnant patients.

conclusionObstetric doctors in Ghana strongly support the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring, would use values to inform their clinical management, and believe it would improve patient outcomes. Addressing the most significant barriers, including cost of blood pressure monitors, lack of a communication system to convey abnormal values, and need for patient education, is essential for successful implementation.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryPre-EclampsiaBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansPregnancyTertiary Care CentersEclampsiaHigh blood pressure in pregnancyHome monitoringHypertensive disorders of pregnancyLMICPatient monitoringPreeclampsiaProvider perspectiveSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID36658509
PMCPMC9854160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.