Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658484›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Accommodating multiple potential normalizations in microbiome associations studies.

Hoseung Song, Wodan Ling, Ni Zhao, Anna M Plantinga, Courtney A Broedlow, Nichole R Klatt, Tiffany Hensley-McBain, Michael C Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hoseung SongPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wodan LingPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ni ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anna M PlantingaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA.
Courtney A BroedlowDivision of Surgical Outcomes and Precision Medicine Research, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nichole R KlattDivision of Surgical Outcomes and Precision Medicine Research, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tiffany Hensley-McBainMcLaughlin Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Great Falls, MT, USA.
Michael C WuPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. mcwu@fredhutch.org.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Large Scale Microbiome Studies of Cardiovascular Disease RiskR01HL155417 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Joint Analysis of Microbiome and Other Genomic Data TypesR01GM129512 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155417NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129512NIH HHS R01 GM129512, R01 HL155417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobial communities are known to be closely related to many diseases, such as obesity and HIV, and it is of interest to identify differentially abundant microbial species between two or more environments. Since the abundances or counts of microbial species usually have different scales and suffer from zero-inflation or over-dispersion, normalization is a critical step before conducting differential abundance analysis. Several normalization approaches have been proposed, but it is difficult to optimize the characterization of the true relationship between taxa and interesting outcomes. 

resultsTo avoid the challenge of picking an optimal normalization and accommodate the advantages of several normalization strategies, we propose an omnibus approach. Our approach is based on a Cauchy combination test, which is flexible and powerful by aggregating individual p values. We also consider a truncated test statistic to prevent substantial power loss. We experiment with a basic linear regression model as well as recently proposed powerful association tests for microbiome data and compare the performance of the omnibus approach with individual normalization approaches. Experimental results show that, regardless of simulation settings, the new approach exhibits power that is close to the best normalization strategy, while controling the type I error well. 

conclusionsThe proposed omnibus test releases researchers from choosing among various normalization methods and it is an aggregated method that provides the powerful result to the underlying optimal normalization, which requires tedious trial and error. While the power may not exceed the best normalization, it is always much better than using a poor choice of normalization.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaComputer SimulationLinear ModelsResearchCauchy combination testDifferent library sizeNormalizationOmnibus approach

Identifiers

PMID36658484
PMCPMC9850542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.