Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658367›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Structured reporting of computed tomography in the polytrauma patient assessment: a Delphi consensus proposal.

Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Diletta Cozzi, Ginevra Danti, Lorenzo Faggioni, Duccio Buccicardi, Roberto Prost, Riccardo Ferrari, Margherita Trinci, Michele Galluzzo and 20 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Aortic Injury and Hemopericardium: Key Findings and Evaluation.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS Di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, Naples, Italy.
Diletta CozziDivision of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Ginevra DantiDivision of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo FaggioniAcademic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy. lfaggioni@sirm.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5262-4489
Duccio BuccicardiImaging Department, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy.
Roberto ProstRadiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.
Riccardo FerrariDepartment of Emergency Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Margherita TrinciDepartment of Emergency Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Michele GalluzzoDepartment of Emergency Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Francesca IacobellisDepartment of General and Emergency Radiology, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Mariano ScaglioneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Michele ToneriniDepartment of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca CoppolaDepartment of Radiology, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy.
Chandra BortolottoDepartment of Radiology, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Damiano CarusoDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora CiaghiResearch and Development, Exprivia Spa, Bari, Italy.
Michela GabelloniAcademic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Marco RengoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuliana GiacobbeDepartment of General and Emergency Radiology, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Francesca GrassiDivision of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Luigia RomanoDepartment of General and Emergency Radiology, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Antonio PintoRadiology Unit, C.T.O. Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Ferdinando CaranciDivision of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Elena BertelliDivision of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Paolo D'AndreaRadiology Unit, "Sant'Anna E San Sebastiano" Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Emanuele NeriItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology SIRM, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Roberto GrassiItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology SIRM, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Vittorio MieleDivision of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a structured reporting (SR) template for whole-body CT examinations of polytrauma patients, based on the consensus of a panel of emergency radiology experts from the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology.

methodsA multi-round Delphi method was used to quantify inter-panelist agreement for all SR sections. Internal consistency for each section and quality analysis in terms of average inter-item correlation were evaluated by means of the Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient.

resultsThe final SR form included 118 items (6 in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, 4 in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, 9 in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and 99 in the "Report" section). The experts' overall mean score and sum of scores were 4.77 (range 1-5) and 257.56 (range 206-270) in the first Delphi round, and 4.96 (range 4-5) and 208.44 (range 200-210) in the second round, respectively. In the second Delphi round, the experts' overall mean score was higher than in the first round, and standard deviation was lower (3.11 in the second round vs 19.71 in the first round), reflecting a higher expert agreement in the second round. Moreover, Cα was higher in the second round than in the first round (0.97 vs 0.87).

conclusionsOur SR template for whole-body CT examinations of polytrauma patients is based on a strong agreement among panel experts in emergency radiology and could improve communication between radiologists and the trauma team.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaRadiologyDelphi TechniqueHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyPolytraumaRadiology reportStructured report

Identifiers

PMID36658367
PMCPMC9938818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.