Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A deep learning model incorporating spatial and temporal information successfully detects visual field worsening using a consensus based approach.

Jasdeep Sabharwal, Kaihua Hou, Patrick Herbert, Chris Bradley, Chris A Johnson, Michael Wall, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Mathias Unberath, Jithin Yohannan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasdeep Sabharwal *Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kaihua Hou *Malone Center for Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Patrick HerbertMalone Center for Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chris BradleyWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chris A JohnsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Michael WallDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Pradeep Y RamuluWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mathias UnberathMalone Center for Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jithin YohannanWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. jithin@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Iowa · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

A Comprehensive Strategy to Detect Glaucoma Worsening Earlier and With Fewer TestsK23EY032204 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI YOHANNAN, JITHIN · 2021 to 2025
$956k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY032204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, and its worsening is most often monitored with visual field (VF) testing. Deep learning models (DLM) may help identify VF worsening consistently and reproducibly. In this study, we developed and investigated the performance of a DLM on a large population of glaucoma patients. We included 5099 patients (8705 eyes) seen at one institute from June 1990 to June 2020 that had VF testing as well as clinician assessment of VF worsening. Since there is no gold standard to identify VF worsening, we used a consensus of six commonly used algorithmic methods which include global regressions as well as point-wise change in the VFs. We used the consensus decision as a reference standard to train/test the DLM and evaluate clinician performance. 80%, 10%, and 10% of patients were included in training, validation, and test sets, respectively. Of the 873 eyes in the test set, 309 [60.6%] were from females and the median age was 62.4; (IQR 54.8-68.9). The DLM achieved an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.99). Even after removing the 6 most recent VFs, providing fewer data points to the model, the DLM successfully identified worsening with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.84). Clinician assessment of worsening (based on documentation from the health record at the time of the final VF in each eye) had an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.63-0.66). Both the DLM and clinician performed worse when the initial disease was more severe. This data shows that a DLM trained on a consensus of methods to define worsening successfully identified VF worsening and could help guide clinicians during routine clinical care.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaConsensusDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVision DisordersVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID36658309
PMCPMC9852268
OpenAlexW4317433584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.