ArticleScientific reports2023
Fasting plasma glucose level-based formula for estimating starting daily dose in basal-bolus insulin therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no standard formula for estimating the starting daily dose (SDD) of basal-bolus insulin therapy (BBT). We aimed to develop a formula for estimating SDD and evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for BBT. In the first study (n = 104), we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between peak daily dose (PDD) during hospitalization and clinical parameters. The PDD was significantly associated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (R = 0.449, P < 0.0001) and HbA1c levels (R = 0.384, P < 0.0001) but not body weight, body mass index, body surface area, or serum C-peptide levels. Based on the results, we developed a formula for estimating SDD using FPG levels: SDD (U/day) = 0.08 × FPG (mg/dL). In the second study (n = 405), we assessed efficacy and safety of the formula by evaluating the M-value from the daily glucose profile and assessing the frequency of hypoglycemia (blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL). When BBT was initiated using the FPG level-based formula, the M-values decreased from 61.0 ± 52.8 to 12.8 ± 10.8 (P < 0.0001), and hypoglycemia was observed in only 3/405 cases (0.74%) under the SDD. The FPG level-based formula is useful for estimating SDD in BBT and is safe for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.