Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658248›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Symptom Trajectories Informing Patient Care After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Study.

Li Tang, Hongfan Yu, Wei Dai, Xiaojun Yang, Xing Wei, Xin Shelley Wang, Charles S Cleeland, Qiang Li, Qiuling Shi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Predictive relationship in perioperative symptoms and step count for lung cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Li TangState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-6487
Hongfan YuSchool of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3167-1491
Wei DaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1650-1590
Xiaojun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xing WeiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3035-5633
Xin Shelley WangDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-8005
Charles S CleelandDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-6527
Qiang LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-4132
Qiuling ShiState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. qshi@cqmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-3809
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNChongqing Public Health Medical Center · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USChongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApplication of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in surgical oncology has been limited because of patient heterogeneity. We analyzed symptom trajectories and their associations with recovery outcomes after lung cancer surgery, aiming to profile the heterogeneity of patients' experiences and to identify patients needing extensive care.

methodsSymptoms were assessed with the MDASI-LC before surgery, daily after surgery in hospital and weekly within 1 month after discharge. Patients were clustered based on symptoms from post-operative day 1 (POD1) to POD5, using the latent-class-trajectory-model. Functional recovery was compared across the trajectories. Logistic regression was used to explore risk factors for trajectories of more severe symptoms.

resultsBased on the five most severe post-surgery symptoms (pain, fatigue, coughing, shortness of breath, and disturbed sleep), we identified three distinct symptom trajectories among 424 patients [mild, N = 225 (53.07%); severe-to-mild, N = 86 (20.28%); severe, N = 104 (24.53%)]. At discharge, more 'severe' patients (73.96%) did not achieve a functional recovery compared with those in mild (32.54%, P < 0.0001) or severe-to-mild (56.96%, P = 0.0274) groups. Factors of significant symptom increase on POD1 were younger-than-55 (OR = 1.94 [95% CI 1.30-2.93], P = 0.001), undergoing open or multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (OR = 1.59 [95% CI 1.05-2.41], P = 0.03), and using two chest tubes (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 1.12-2.65], P = 0.01). For patients experiencing dramatic symptom increase on POD1, older age (OR = 2.51 [95% CI 1.40-4.59], P = 0.002) was associated with 'severe' trajectory.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that PRO measures were capable of profiling heterogeneous symptom trajectories after lung cancer surgery. Those in-hospital trajectories were able to differentiate patients' responses to treatments and signal the needs for extensive post-discharge care.

Indexed as

AftercareLung NeoplasmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesPatient DischargePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSymptom Flare Up

Identifiers

PMID36658248
OpenAlexW4317438805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.