Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658063›Full record

ArticleClinical breast cancer2023

Did the National Ban on Bacitracin Irrigation Affect Infection Rates in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction? An Analysis of a National Database.

Olachi O Oleru, Arya A Akhavan, Nargiz Seyidova, Taylor Ibelli, Peter J Taub, Peter Henderson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Olachi O OleruDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Arya A AkhavanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Nargiz SeyidovaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Taylor IbelliSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Peter J TaubDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Peter HendersonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Electronic address: peter.henderson@mountsinai.org.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

J: NRSA Training CoreTL1TR004420 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI JANICE L GABRILOVE, Robert O Wright · 2022 to 2026
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR004420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe current standard of practice in implant-based breast reconstruction is irrigation of the mastectomy pocket with antimicrobial solution before implant placement. Prior to being banned and formally recalled in January 2020, bacitracin was a very commonly utilized antibiotic. This study characterizes the effects of the national bacitracin ban on implant-based breast reconstruction infection rates by using a nationwide database to compare complication rates before and after bacitracin was banned. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried retrospectively for all patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction before the bacitracin ban (2012-2019) and afterwards (2020). Demographics, comorbidities, and complications were collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were conducted to determine if there were significant changes in wound complications, local wound infections, and systemic infections between the 2 case-control matched cohorts.

resultsA total of 37,126 patients were in the pre-ban cohort and 6333 patients were in the post-ban cohort. Before matching, there were significant differences in race distribution, BMI, ASA class, inpatient vs. outpatient status, preoperative smoking, and preoperative diabetes mellitus (all P < .05). After case-control matching, there were 6313 patients in each cohort. Univariate analysis revealed differences in postoperative superficial and organ space surgical site infection, wound complications/infections, all cause complications, and reoperations (all P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that patients who underwent breast reconstruction before the ban had decreased odds of having wound infections, related infections, all cause complications, and reoperations (all P < .05).

conclusionThis study provides a macroscopic view into the effects of the formal injectable bacitracin ban on breast reconstruction outcomes. Patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after the ban of injectable bacitracin had higher odds of developing wound infections, related infections, and reoperations. More study into suitable alternatives to injectable bacitracin for surgical site antimicrobial irrigation is warranted.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyBacitracinFemaleHumansMastectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionBacitracinBacitracin banBreast implant infection

Identifiers

PMID36658063
PMCPMC11000432
OpenAlexW4313319721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.