Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658045›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

Safety of primary immunization using inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac®) among population aged 3 years and older in a large-scale use: A multi-center open-label study in China.

Haitao Yang, Zhen Li, Ruizhi Zhang, Shicheng Guo, Binbing Wang, Xing Fang, Dongjuan Zhang, Xiaoshu Zhang, Yeqing Tong, Qing Wang and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04911790 phase4completednot on this map

Safety Observation of the Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell) in Population Aged 18 Years and Older: A Multicenter,Open-label Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled131,650ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsExperimental Group
NCT04992208 phase4completednot on this map

Safety Observation of the Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell) in Population Aged 3~17 Years : A Multicenter,Open-label Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled31,041ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsExperimental Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Haitao YangYunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Zhen LiMedical Affairs Department, Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd, China.
Ruizhi ZhangGuizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Shicheng GuoJiangxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Binbing WangAnhui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Xing FangLiaoning Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Dongjuan ZhangFujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Xiaoshu ZhangGansu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Yeqing TongHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Qing WangChongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Qiuyun DengGuangxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Zhaodan SunHeilongjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China.
Xiaoqiang LiuYunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China. Electronic address: lxq7611@126.com.
Yongjun GaoMedical Affairs Department, Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd, China. Electronic address: gaoyj5737@sinovac.com.
Sinovac Biotech · CNYunnan Center for Disease Control And Prevention · CNAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNGansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNGuangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNGuizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety of primary immunization using CoronaVac® among population aged 3 years and above in a large-scale use.

methodA multi-center open-label study was carried out in 11 provinces of China. Individuals aged 3 years and older who had no history of COVID-19 vaccination or had received only one dose of CoronaVac® were enrolled in this study. Adults and elderly with or without underlying medical conditions(UMCs) were also recruited. Eligible participants received one or two doses of CoronaVac® with an interval of 28 days. Demographic information, vaccination and the occurrence of adverse events were recorded by participants or guardians using data collection system designed for this study. All adverse events occurred within 6 months after the second dose of vaccination were collected. The incidence of adverse events that cannot be ruled out as being caused by the vaccine were calculated to assess the safety of CoronaVac®. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials. Gov (NCT04911790 and NCT04992208).

resultsA total of 162,691 participants have been included in this study and 89.50 % had finished primary immunization. Among adults and elderly, people with UMCs accounted for 25.85 %, with the top five disease being hypertension, diabetes, chronic gastritis, coronary heart disease(CHD) and kidney stone. The overall incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) within 6 months after the second vaccination was 2.70 %, with incidence for children and adolescents, adults, and elderly being 2.03 %, 3.46 %, and 1.90 %, respectively. Most ARs were mild (grade 1). Pain at the injection sites, fatigue, induration/swelling, and headache were the most common symptoms, occurring in 1.64 %, 0.46 %, 0.31 % and 0.24 %, respectively. No serious adverse events related to vaccines were reported. No adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified. For children and adolescents, children aged 3-5 years had the highest incidence of ARs of 3.29 %. The incidence of ARs among those aged 18 years and older with and without UMCs were 2.81 % and 2.99 %, respectively, with no statistical significance between two groups(P = 0.089). And people with coronary heart disease had higher AR incidence compared to those with other UMCs, but the most common symptoms was pain at the injection site.

conclusionCoronaVac® is safe in a large-scale use and shows well-tolerance for children and adolescents and people with underlying medical conditions. Further studies need to be conducted to explore the relation of ARs incidence to age or different kinds of UMCs.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralChildHumansPainSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID36658045
PMCPMC9837223
OpenAlexW4316038228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.