Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36657196›Full record

SynthesisActa psychologica2023

Attention and memory after COVID-19 as measured by neuropsychological tests: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Boris B Velichkovsky, Anna Yu Razvaliaeva, Alena A Khlebnikova, Piruza A Manukyan, Vladimir N Kasatkin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta psychologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cognitive Aspects of COVID-19.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Boris B VelichkovskyResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, RUDN University (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia), 117198, 11A Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russia; Lomonosov Moscow State University, 125009, 11 Mokhovaya str., Moscow, Russia.
Anna Yu RazvaliaevaInstitute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 129366, 13 Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: anna.razvaliaeva@gmail.com.
Alena A KhlebnikovaLomonosov Moscow State University, 125009, 11 Mokhovaya str., Moscow, Russia.
Piruza A ManukyanResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, RUDN University (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia), 117198, 11A Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russia; Lomonosov Moscow State University, 125009, 11 Mokhovaya str., Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir N KasatkinResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, RUDN University (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia), 117198, 11A Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russia.
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUInstitute of Psychology · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is associated with a range of sequelae, including cognitive dysfunctions as long-standing symptoms. Considering that the number of people infected worldwide keeps growing, it is important to understand specific domains of impairments to further organize appropriate rehabilitation procedures. In this study we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate specific cognitive functions impacted by COVID-19. A literature search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and preprint databases (OSF and PsyArXiv via OSF Preprints, medRxiv, bioRxiv, Research Square). We included the studies that compared cognitive functioning in COVID-19 reconvalescents and healthy controls, and used at least one validated neuropsychological test. Our findings show that short-term memory in the verbal domain, and possibly, visual short-term memory and attention, are at risk in COVID-19 reconvalescents. The impact of COVID-19 on cognitive functioning has yet to be studied in detail. In the future more controlled studies with validated computerized tests might help deepen our understanding of the issue. PSYCINFO CLASSIFICATION: 3360 Health Psychology & Medicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19AttentionCognitionHumansMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsCognitive functionsCOVID-19 sequelaeLong-term memorymeta-analysisShort-term memoryVisual-spatial attention

Identifiers

PMID36657196
PMCPMC9834202
OpenAlexW4315651785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.