ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2023
Biomechanical effects of esophageal elongation on the circumferential tension of the cervical esophagus in vivo.
Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Esophageal peristalsis in health and disease: mechanistic insights.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- Coordination of Pharyngeal and Esophageal Phases of Swallowing.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024Review
- Biomechanical increase in cervical esophageal wall tension during peristalsis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence obtained ex vivo suggests that physical elongation of the esophagus increases esophageal circumferential stress-strain ratio, but it is unknown whether this biomechanical effect alters esophageal function in vivo. We investigated the effects of physical or physiological elongation of the cervical esophagus on basal and active circumferential tension in vivo. The esophagus was elongated, using 29 decerebrate cats, either physically by distal physical extension of the esophagus or physiologically by stimulating the hypoglossal nerve, which activates laryngeal elevating muscles that elongate the esophagus. Hyoid, pharyngeal, and esophageal muscles were instrumented with electromyogram (EMG) electrodes and/or strain gauge force transducers. Esophageal intraluminal manometry was also recorded. We found that physical or physiological elongation of the cervical esophagus increased esophageal circumferential basal as well as active tension initiated by electrical stimulation of the pharyngo-esophageal nerve or the esophageal muscle directly, but did not increase esophageal intraluminal pressure or EMG activity. The esophageal circumferential response to the esophago-esophageal contractile reflex was increased by distal physical elongation, but not orad physiological elongation. We conclude that physical or physiological elongation of the esophagus significantly increases esophageal circumferential basal and active tension without muscle activation. We hypothesize that this effect is caused by an increase in esophageal stress-strain ratio by a biomechanical process, which increases circumferential wall stiffness. The increase in esophageal circumferential stiffness increases passive tension and the effectiveness of active tension. This increase in cervical esophageal circumferential stiffness may alter esophageal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.