ArticlePloS one2023
SARS-CoV-2 genotyping and sequencing following a simple and economical RNA extraction and storage protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nipah virus molecular detection from whole blood and respiratory swabs in a rapid field-ready protocol.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2026Article
- Validation of prototype virus inactivation from seven virus families of pandemic potential with a novel low-cost, field-deployable RNA extraction and storage method.Journal of virological methods · 2026Article
- Portable hepatitis C virus RNA extraction and stabilization using low-cost lab-on-a-chip style components with shelf stable reagents.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, supply chain shortages have caused major disruptions in sourcing the materials needed for laboratory-based molecular assays. With increasing demand for molecular testing, these disruptions have limited testing capacity and hindered efforts to mitigate spread of the virus and new variants. Here we evaluate an economical and reliable protocol for the extraction and short-term ambient temperature storage of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Additional objectives of the study were to evaluate RNA from this protocol for 1) detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the spike gene and 2) whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2. The RNAES protocol was evaluated with residual nasopharyngeal (NP) samples collected from Emory Healthcare and Emory Student Health services. All RNAES extractions were performed in duplicate and once with a commercial extraction robot for comparison. Following extraction, eluates were immediately tested by rRT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was successfully detected in 56/60 (93.3%) RNAES replicates, and Ct values corresponded with comparator results. Upon testing in spike SNP assays, three genotypes were identified, and all variant calls were consistent with those previously obtained after commercial extraction. Additionally, the SARS-RNAES protocol yield eluate pure enough for downstream whole genome sequencing, and results were consistent with SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing of eluates matched for Ct value. With reproducible results across a range of virus concentrations, the SARS-RNAES protocol could help increase SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing and monitoring for emerging variants in resource-constrained communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.