Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656838›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2023

Historic samples reveal loss of wild genotype through domestic chicken introgression during the Anthropocene.

Meng Yue Wu, Giovanni Forcina, Gabriel Weijie Low, Keren R Sadanandan, Chyi Yin Gwee, Hein van Grouw, Shaoyuan Wu, Scott V Edwards, Maude W Baldwin, Frank E Rheindt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meng Yue WuDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8562-7667
Giovanni ForcinaDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5727-7770
Gabriel Weijie LowDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1276-7618
Keren R SadanandanEvolution of Sensory Systems Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-8091
Chyi Yin GweeDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hein van GrouwBird Group, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Tring, United Kingdom.
Shaoyuan WuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Tianjin for Medical Epigenetics, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, Chin.
Scott V EdwardsDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Maude W BaldwinEvolution of Sensory Systems Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7601-8894
Frank E RheindtDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-7085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities have precipitated a rise in the levels of introgressive gene flow among animals. The investigation of conspecific populations at different time points may shed light on the magnitude of human-mediated introgression. We used the red junglefowl Gallus gallus, the wild ancestral form of the chicken, as our study system. As wild junglefowl and domestic chickens readily admix, conservationists fear that domestic introgression into junglefowl may compromise their wild genotype. By contrasting the whole genomes of 51 chickens with 63 junglefowl from across their natural range, we found evidence of a loss of the wild genotype across the Anthropocene. When comparing against the genomes of junglefowl from approximately a century ago using rigorous ancient-DNA protocols, we discovered that levels of domestic introgression are not equal among and within modern wild populations, with the percentage of domestic ancestry around 20-50%. We identified a number of domestication markers in which chickens are deeply differentiated from historic junglefowl regardless of breed and/or geographic provenance, with eight genes under selection. The latter are involved in pathways dealing with development, reproduction and vision. The wild genotype is an allelic reservoir that holds most of the genetic diversity of G. gallus, a species which is immensely important to human society. Our study provides fundamental genomic infrastructure to assist in efforts to prevent a further loss of the wild genotype through introgression of domestic alleles.

Indexed as

ChickensGenetics, PopulationGenomeAnimalsGene FlowGenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36656838
PMCPMC9851510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.