Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656746›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2023

Mapping bacterial biofilm on explanted orthopedic hardware: An analysis of 14 consecutive cases.

Jacob R Brooks, Douglas J Chonko, Matthew Pigott, Anne C Sullivan, Kelly Moore, Paul Stoodley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biofilm Formation Patterns ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob R BrooksMedical Student Research Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6903-4389
Douglas J ChonkoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Matthew PigottDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Anne C SullivanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kelly MooreDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Paul StoodleyDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

The role of Staphylococcus aureus aggregate formation in establishing biofilms in chronic orthopaedic periprosthetic joint infection.R01GM124436 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STOODLEY, PAUL · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hardware implanted during primary total joint arthroplasty carries a serious risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The formation of bacterial biofilms, which are highly tolerant of antibiotics and host immunity, is recognized as being a major barrier to treatment. It is not known whether some components and their surface features are more prone to biofilm than others. This study attempted to map biofilm on different components and features of orthopedic hardware recovered during revision. Implant surface culture (ISC) was used on 53 components from 14 hip and knee revisions. ISC achieves a thin agar coating over components, followed by incubation and observation for colony outgrowth over 9 days. Recovered organisms were identified by selective culture and 16s rRNA sequencing. Outcomes were compared with clinical culturing and PJI diagnosis based on 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. ISC paralleled clinical culturing with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 57.1%. When compared to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, sensitivity remained at 100% while specificity was 80%. Biofilm accumulation was patchy and heterogeneous throughout different prostheses, though notably the non-articulating surfaces between the tibial tray and polyethylene insert showed consistent growth. On individual components, ridges and edges consistently harbored biofilm, while growth elsewhere was case dependent. ISC successfully identified microbial growth with high sensitivity while also revealing that biofilm growth was commonly localized to particular locations. Understanding where biofilm formation occurs most often on implanted hardware will help guide debridement, retention choices, and implant design.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Simplant surface cultureMapping biofilmperiprosthetic joint infectionStaphylococcus aureustotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36656746
PMCPMC10012203
OpenAlexW4317477414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.