Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656724›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2023

Confirmatory measurement modeling and longitudinal invariance of the CompACT-15: A short-form assessment of psychological flexibility.

Ti Hsu, Lesa Hoffman, Emily B K Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Suicidality, Psychological Inflexibility, and Emotional Resilience Among Black College Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ti HsuDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-8078-8720
Lesa HoffmanDepartment of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-6735
Emily B K ThomasDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-1157

Funding

Mechanisms of Health and Disease at the Behavioral-Biomedical InterfaceT32GM108540 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LUTGENDORF, SUSAN K, VOSS, MICHELLE WEBB · 2014 to 2023
$1.7M
Modeling mood course to detect markers for effective adaptive interventionsK01MH112876 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COCHRAN, AMY LOUISE · 2017 to 2020
$511k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108540NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS K01 MH112876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT; Francis et al., 2016) is a recently developed measure of psychological flexibility (PF) possessing several advantages over other measures of PF, including multidimensional assessment and relative brevity. Unfortunately, previous psychometric evaluations of the CompACT have been limited by their use of exploratory factor analysis to assess dimensionality, coefficient α to assess reliability, and a lack of attention to measurement equivalence in assessing change over time. The present study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item factor analysis (IFA) to examine the dimensionality, factor-specific reliability, longitudinal measurement invariance, and construct validity of the CompACT items in a longitudinal online sample of U.S. adults (

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36656724
PMCPMC10101904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.