Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656697›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2022

Simulation-based prostate enucleation training: Initial experience using 3D-printed organ phantoms.

Claudia Deyirmendjian, David-Dan Nguyen, Sero Andonian, Melanie Aubé-Peterkin, Julien Letendre, Dean Elterman, Kevin C Zorn, Bilal Chughtai, Arkadiusz Miernik, Andreas J Gross and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 3D-printing better urologists?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudia DeyirmendjianFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David-Dan NguyenDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sero AndonianDivision of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Melanie Aubé-PeterkinDivision of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julien LetendreDivision of Urology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Dean EltermanDivision of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kevin C ZornDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Bilal ChughtaiDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas J GrossDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Naeem BhojaniDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DECornell University · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is an effective treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); however, there is controversy regarding the difficulty of learning such a technique. Simulation-based training can mimic real-life surgeries and help surgeons develop skills they can transfer to the operating room, thereby improving patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of a novel organ phantom for use in AEEP simulation training.

methodsParticipants performed AEEP on organ phantom simulators during a Masterclass using one of three energy modalities: holmium:YAG laser, thulium fiber laser, or bipolar energy. The organ phantom is composed of hydrogels and uses 3D molds to recreate prostatic tissue. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing content validity, face validity, feasibility, and acceptability of using the prostate organ phantom.

resultsThe novice group consisted of 13 urologists. The median number of AEEP previously performed was 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2). Two experts in AEEP (surgeons having performed over 100 AEEP interventions) also participated. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that there is a role for simulators in AEEP training. Participants positively rated the overall operative experience (7.3/10). Morcellation (4.7/10) and hemostasis (3.1/10) were deemed the least realistic steps. All participants considered it feasible to incorporate this organ phantom into training programs and 92.9% agreed that it teaches skills transferrable to the operating room.

conclusionsThis study has established content and face validity for AEEP with three different energy sources for an organ phantom. Participants considered its use both feasible and appropriate for AEEP training purposes.

Identifiers

PMID36656697
PMCPMC9851226
OpenAlexW4286699128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.