Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656629›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2023

Web-Based Interventions for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pingping Guo, Dandan Chen, Ping Xu, Xiaojuan Wang, Wei Zhang, Minna Mao, Qiong Zheng, Ying Jin, Suwen Feng

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pingping GuoWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5091-9387
Dandan ChenFaculty of Nursing, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4488-5624
Ping XuWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2434-8437
Xiaojuan WangWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1947-5140
Wei ZhangWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9884-0494
Minna MaoWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7413-1554
Qiong ZhengWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9663-3459
Ying JinWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4073-1732
Suwen FengWomen's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-0418
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is essential because it is one of the most prevalent diseases during pregnancy, and the consequent condition maternal hyperglycemia is closely related to considerable short- and long-term maternal and neonatal complications. Web-based interventions (WBIs), defined as therapeutic interventions offered via the web, have been implemented to assist in managing GDM owing to their advantages of high accessibility and efficiency, but findings across relevant studies are inconsistent.

objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of WBIs on glycemic control among pregnant women with GDM; examine whether specific types of intervention interactivity, format, and technology have beneficial effects on maternal glycemic control; and comprehensively assess the efficacy of WBIs in maternal behavioral outcomes, cognitive and attitudinal outcomes, mental health, maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes, and medical service use and costs among pregnant women with GDM.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from their respective inception to November 19, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. Where possible, the data for all outcomes were meta-analyzed using the Stata software (version 12.0; StataCorp). Overall, 3 subgroup analyses and post hoc sensitivity analyses of maternal glycemic control parameters were performed.

resultsOverall, 25 publications arising from 21 randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials were included. The overall meta-analyses on glycemic control parameters demonstrated that WBIs could significantly improve fasting blood glucose (standardized mean difference=-1.764, 95% CI -2.972 to -0.557; P=.004) and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (standardized mean difference=-1.433, 95% CI -2.561 to -0.304; P=.01) compared with the control group, whereas no significant effect was found on glycated hemoglobin and 1-hour postprandial blood glucose. The results of the subgroup analyses indicated that mobile app-delivered interventions with a personalized format and interactive function showed more beneficial effects on maternal glycemic control. Moreover, WBIs could significantly enhance compliance with the self-monitoring of blood glucose; increase the rate of normal vaginal delivery; and decrease the chance of emergency cesarean, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and composite neonatal complications. GDM knowledge, risk perception of the disease, self-efficacy, satisfaction with care, and medical service use of the participants in the WBI group were also improved compared with the control group. However, the effectiveness of WBIs on other secondary outcomes was either nonsignificant or uncertain.

conclusionsWBIs are a promising approach to GDM management. Personalized, interactive, and mobile app-delivered interventions seem more worthy of being recommended for future clinical practice. Further high-quality studies are required to verify these findings before making broad recommendations.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022296625; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=296625.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalInternet-Based InterventionBlood GlucoseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobingestational diabetes mellitusinternetinterventionmeta-analysismobile phonepregnant womensystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36656629
PMCPMC9896357
OpenAlexW4313043854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.