Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656623›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2023

Wellness Warriors: a qualitative exploration of healthcare staff learning to support their colleagues in the aftermath of the Australian bushfires.

Andrea Knezevic, Katarzyna Olcoń, Louisa Smith, Julaine Allan, Padmini Pai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Vulnerability to Strength: Transforming Health Systems for Climate Resilience.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea KnezevicSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-8351
Katarzyna OlcońSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Louisa SmithDeakin University.
Julaine AllanRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
Padmini PaiIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District.
University of Wollongong · AUCharles Sturt University · AUDeakin University · AUIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHealthcare staff are on the frontline during disasters despite any personal adversity and vicarious trauma they may be experiencing.

methodThis study explored the experiences and perspectives of 18 healthcare staff who were trained to provide emotional and peer support to their colleagues in the aftermath of a crisis. All the

resultsHealthcare staff reported developing interpersonal skills around deep listening and connecting with others which allowed for hearing the core of their colleagues' concerns. The training also helped staff to feel differently about work and restored their faith in healthcare leadership.

conclusion

Indexed as

COVID-19DisastersAustraliaDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsburnoutBushfireshealthcare providersmental health and wellbeingoccupational traumapost disasterworkplace wellness

Identifiers

PMID36656623
PMCPMC9858529
OpenAlexW4317477657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.