ArticleJAMA network open2023
Receipt of Targeted Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a cfDNA 5mC/5hmC-based Epigenetic Biomarker Panel to Predict Chemotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Development of a cfDNA 5mC/5hmC-based Epigenetic Biomarker Panel to Identify Determinants of Response In VEGF/EGFR-targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating miRNAs as liquid biopsy biomarkers for diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Large-scale AI-guided liver malignancy diagnosis: multicenter study and a single-arm trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of chemotherapy-induced nausea during irinotecan-based treatment based on prior oxaliplatin-induced symptoms in colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of colorectal liver metastasis management: from resection to transplantation - a narrative review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Activation of an adaptive antitumor immune response by the polymeric fluoropyrimidine CF10 involves TS/Top1 dual targeting.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026Article
- Review
- Association between chronic stress-related amygdala metabolic activity and distant metastasis in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Biomarker Testing Approaches, Treatment Selection, and Cost of Care Among Adults With Advanced Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Single-cell and Multi-omics Analysis Confirmed the Signature and Potential Targets of Cuproptosis in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Fruquintinib for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the USA.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Real-world assessment of comprehensive genome profiling impact on clinical outcomes: A single-institution study in Japan.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Post-Operative Care of the Cancer Patient: Emphasis on Functional Recovery, Rapid Rescue, and Survivorship.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Extraction, Purification, Structural Characteristics, Health Benefits, and Application of the Polysaccharides fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Professional society guidelines recommend treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with targeted therapies, including epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, depending on the presence or absence of certain mutations. Since most studies of first-line targeted therapies have been limited by sample size, there is a need for larger studies using data from routine clinical care. Objectives: To identify factors associated with receipt of first-line targeted therapies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for whom RAS or BRAF mutation data in the tumor were available and investigate whether targeted therapy is associated with survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used deidentified data from an electronic health record-derived database to include patients from 800 sites of patient care across the US who were diagnosed with de novo metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020 (n = 9134). Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of first-line targeted therapy, categorized as ever having received EGFR inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors, or neither. The secondary outcome was overall survival. Results: The study population included 9134 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (IQR, 53-71 years), 5019 (54.9%) were male, and 5692 (62.3%) were White. The median follow-up period was 15 months. Overall, 713 patients (7.8%) received EGFR inhibitors and 5081 patients (55.6%) received VEGF inhibitors as part of their first-line treatment. Among patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-WT) tumors, 625 patients (15.5%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2053 patients (50.9%) received VEGF inhibitors. In patients with RAS mutant (RAS-Mut) tumors, 50 patients (1.1%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2682 patients (59.7%) received VEGF inhibitors; among those with BRAF-mutant (BRAF-Mut) tumors, 38 patients (6.3%) received EGFR inhibitors and 346 patients (57.2%) received VEGF inhibitors. More than one-third of the patients (36.6%) received neither EGFR inhibitors nor VEGF inhibitors. Compared with patients younger than age 40 years, those aged 80 years or older had significantly lower odds to receive targeted therapies (EGFR or VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-WT tumors: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79; and VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-Mut tumors: aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90). Improved survival was associated with EGFR inhibitor therapy in patients with RAS-WT tumors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). Unlike in clinical trials, however, no survival benefit was noted with use of VEGF inhibitors among patients with RAS-WT (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.11) or RAS-Mut (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10) tumors. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study showed mixed results on survival benefits associated with targeted therapy. In addition, given that some of the results differed from those of randomized clinical trials, this study highlights the importance of using data originating from routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.