Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656489›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2023

Challenges in the Biological Control of Pests in Poultry Production: a Critical Review of Advances in Brazil.

Luis Francisco Angeli Alves, Liana Johann, Daian Guilherme Pinto Oliveira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biological Control in Latin America.Neotropical entomology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luis Francisco Angeli AlvesAgricultural Biotechnology Laboratory, Western Parana State University, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil. Luis.Alves@unioeste.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-764X
Liana JohannBolsista de Produtividade Em Pesquisa/CNPq, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-9806
Daian Guilherme Pinto OliveiraBiology Department, Federal University of Technology/UTFPR, Santa Helena, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-7086
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BRUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry farming is an important activity in animal protein production worldwide, either by laying hen farming or broilers. Over the last decades, the change in production systems with confinement of large numbers of hens has increased productivity and reduced costs; however, it has also increased sanitary issues. In this setting, arthropods that are adapted to poultry houses have gained great importance. They cause direct damage to hens, either by blood spoliation caused by ectoparasites or lesions in the digestive tract (e.g., lesser mealworm) or by indirect damages, by transmitting pathogens or by affecting egg quality, when they attain pest status. Synthetic chemical products comprise the most frequently used control strategy against these pests, with relative efficacy and many side effects. In Europe, some countries also adopt alternative prevention or control measures. In Brazil, however, although there are some groups of researchers that work on developing alternative control, its use is virtually zero. The present review shows a critical overview of this context in Brazil, based on the alternatives that have already been studied and made available, but have not been implemented, yet, and the potential stumbling blocks created by the very poultry market against these advances.

Indexed as

ArthropodsColeopteraAnimalsBrazilChickensFemalePoultryAnimal productionFliesLaying hen farmingLesser mealwormPoultry red mite

Identifiers

PMID36656489
OpenAlexW4317475219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.