Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656411›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2023

Nanoceria: an innovative strategy for cancer treatment.

Joyce L Y Tang, Shehzahdi S Moonshi, Hang T Ta

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Porous Ag-Cu-CeOBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Carbon@CeORSC advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joyce L Y TangQueensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Shehzahdi S MoonshiQueensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Hang T TaQueensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia. h.ta@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1188-0472
Griffith University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1037310National Health and Medical Research Council APP1182347National Health and Medical Research Council APP2002827National Heart Foundation of Australia 102761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoceria or cerium oxide nanoparticles characterised by the co-existing of Ce

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCeriumNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAntioxidantsOxidative StressOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsceric oxideCeriumOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesCerium oxideNanomedicineOxidative stressRedox-responsive nanozymesTreatment developmentTumour hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID36656411
PMCPMC9851121
OpenAlexW4317435935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.