Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36656176›Full record

SynthesisAsian journal of andrology2023

Robotic-assisted microsurgery in andrology: a systematic review.

Konstantinos Douroumis, Eleftherios Spartalis, Konstantinos Stravodimos, Panagiotis K Levis, Gerasimos Tsourouflis, Dimitrios Dimitroulis, Nikolaos I Nikiteas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian journal of andrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos DouroumisHellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.
Eleftherios SpartalisHellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.
Konstantinos StravodimosHellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.
Panagiotis K LevisFirst Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 17, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.
Gerasimos TsourouflisHellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.
Dimitrios DimitroulisHellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.
Nikolaos I NikiteasHellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery is the gold standard of treatment in many fields of urology. In this systematic review, we aim to report its usage in andrology and to evaluate any advantages. A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify articles referring to robotic-assisted microsurgery in andrology. The search strategy was in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. The articles were then reviewed by two authors. A qualitative analysis of the articles that met the inclusion criteria was performed. Thirty-one articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The first results for robot-assisted vasovasostomy (RAVV) are encouraging as excellent patency rates, short operative times, and learning curves were achieved. Interestingly, patency rates were greater in some case series for RAVV than for microsurgical vasovasostomy, with a statistically significant difference. In addition, robot has been shown to be of great use in bypassing fibrotic changes in cases of iatrogenic vasal injuries, difficulties encountered with traditional microsurgery. In addition, the feasibility of robot-assisted microsurgery has been proven for varicocelectomy and microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord, with acceptable improvement in sperm parameters and pain, respectively. The current evidence suggests that there are potential advantages of the use of robots in andrology. However, for robotic surgery to become incorporated into the daily use of the andrologists, large, multicenter randomized trials are needed. As robotics systems are becoming standard in urology practice, it is reasonable for one to believe that they will also find their place in andrology.

Indexed as

AndrologyRoboticsVasovasostomyHumansMaleMicrosurgeryMulticenter Studies as TopicSemenandrologymale infertilityrobotic surgical proceduresvaricocelevasovasostomy

Identifiers

PMID36656176
PMCPMC10411258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.