Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655992›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Future COVID19 surges prediction based on SARS-CoV-2 mutations surveillance.

Fares Z Najar, Evan Linde, Chelsea L Murphy, Veniamin A Borin, Huan Wang, Shozeb Haider, Pratul K Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fares Z NajarHigh-Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, United States.
Evan LindeHigh-Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2053-6721
Chelsea L MurphyHigh-Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5367-8593
Veniamin A BorinHigh-Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, United States.
Huan WangUniversity College London School of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, London, United Kingdom.
Shozeb HaiderUniversity College London School of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2650-2925
Pratul K AgarwalHigh-Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-9492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID19 has aptly revealed that airborne viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 with the ability to rapidly mutate combined with high rates of transmission and fatality can cause a deadly worldwide pandemic in a matter of weeks (Plato et al., 2021). Apart from vaccines and post-infection treatment options, strategies for preparedness will be vital in responding to the current and future pandemics. Therefore, there is wide interest in approaches that allow predictions of increase in infections ('surges') before they occur. We describe here real-time genomic surveillance particularly based on mutation analysis, of viral proteins as a methodology for a priori determination of surge in number of infection cases. The full results are available for SARS-CoV-2 at http://pandemics.okstate.edu/covid19/, and are updated daily as new virus sequences become available. This approach is generic and will also be applicable to other pathogens.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2GenomicsHumansMutationcoronavirusCOVID19epidemiologyglobal healthinfectious diseasemicrobiologySARS-CoV-2viruses

Identifiers

PMID36655992
PMCPMC9894583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.