Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655659›Full record

Trial reportZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2023

[Perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of singleton apparently stillborn infants].

Min Yang, Ji-Mei Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish AbstractRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min YangDepartment of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China.
Ji-Mei WangDepartment of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of singleton apparently stillborn infants.

methodsThis was a case-control study. A total of 154 singleton neonates with gestational age ≥28 weeks and Apgar score of 0-1 who were subsequently successfully resuscitated in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 2006 to December 2015 were enrolled as the case group (apparently stillborn group). A total of 616 singleton infants born from January 2006 to December 2015 (1-minute Apgar score >1) were randomly selected in a 1:4 ratio as the control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the perinatal risk factors for the occurrence of apparently stillborn infants.

resultsThe gestational age and birth weight in the apparently stillborn group were significantly lower than those in the control group (

conclusionsAttention needs to be paid to mothers with abnormal prenatal fetal heart monitoring, decreased fetal movement, preterm labor, placental abruption, breech presentation, grade III meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and general anesthesia. Preparations for resuscitation should be done to rescue apparently stillborn infants.

Indexed as

Abruptio PlacentaeBreech PresentationPregnancy ComplicationsApgar ScoreCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyRisk FactorsStillbirthApparently stillborn infantNeonateRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID36655659
PMCPMC9893824
OpenAlexW4317475973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.