Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655551›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Nighttime Continuous Contactless Smartphone-Based Cough Monitoring for the Ward: Validation Study.

Filipe Barata, David Cleres, Peter Tinschert, Chen-Hsuan Iris Shih, Frank Rassouli, Maximilian Boesch, Martin Brutsche, Elgar Fleisch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cough biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of respiratory disease: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filipe BarataCenter for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-2380
David CleresCenter for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-7960
Peter TinschertCenter for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0889-0151
Chen-Hsuan Iris ShihCenter for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-2793
Frank RassouliLung Center, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-3545
Maximilian BoeschLung Center, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0994-9883
Martin BrutscheLung Center, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-3609
Elgar FleischCenter for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-1117
ETH Zurich · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical deterioration can go unnoticed in hospital wards for hours. Mobile technologies such as wearables and smartphones enable automated, continuous, noninvasive ward monitoring and allow the detection of subtle changes in vital signs. Cough can be effectively monitored through mobile technologies in the ward, as it is not only a symptom of prevalent respiratory diseases such as asthma, lung cancer, and COVID-19 but also a predictor of acute health deterioration. In past decades, many efforts have been made to develop an automatic cough counting tool. To date, however, there is neither a standardized, sufficiently validated method nor a scalable cough monitor that can be deployed on a consumer-centric device that reports cough counts continuously. These shortcomings limit the tracking of coughing and, consequently, hinder the monitoring of disease progression in prevalent respiratory diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and COVID-19 in the ward.

objectiveThis exploratory study involved the validation of an automated smartphone-based monitoring system for continuous cough counting in 2 different modes in the ward. Unlike previous studies that focused on evaluating cough detection models on unseen data, the focus of this work is to validate a holistic smartphone-based cough detection system operating in near real time.

methodsAutomated cough counts were measured consistently on devices and on computers and compared with cough and noncough sounds counted manually over 8-hour long nocturnal recordings in 9 patients with pneumonia in the ward. The proposed cough detection system consists primarily of an Android app running on a smartphone that detects coughs and records sounds and secondarily of a backend that continuously receives the cough detection information and displays the hourly cough counts. Cough detection is based on an ensemble convolutional neural network developed and trained on asthmatic cough data.

resultsIn this validation study, a total of 72 hours of recordings from 9 participants with pneumonia, 4 of whom were infected with SARS-CoV-2, were analyzed. All the recordings were subjected to manual analysis by 2 blinded raters. The proposed system yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 99% on the device and 82% and 99% on the computer, respectively, for detecting coughs. The mean differences between the automated and human rater cough counts were -1.0 (95% CI -12.3 to 10.2) and -0.9 (95% CI -6.5 to 4.8) coughs per hour within subject for the on-device and on-computer modes, respectively.

conclusionsThe proposed system thus represents a smartphone cough counter that can be used for continuous hourly assessment of cough frequency in the ward.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkcough monitoringCOVID-19machine learningmobile phonemobile sensingward monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36655551
PMCPMC9989914
OpenAlexW4316923454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.