Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655536›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2023

Obstetric, neonatal, and child health outcomes following embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing.

Alessandra Alteri, Greta Chiara Cermisoni, Mirko Pozzoni, Gerarda Gaeta, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Paola Viganò

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07349966 (A Prospective Observational Study of the Impact of Blastocyst Biopsy on Postnatal Growth in Children Born After Preimplantation Genetic Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
37.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07349966 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Observational Study of the Impact of Blastocyst Biopsy on Postnatal Growth in Children Born After Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2026 to 2028Enrolled330ConditionsPreimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT), Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle, Assisted Reproduction Technologies, Postnatal HealthArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants of fetal growth variability in ART conceptions.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Article
  11. Factors influencing the birth weight of ART-conceived offspring.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  12. Micro magnetic resonance spectroscopy for noninvasive metabolic screening of mammalian embryos and oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra AlteriObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Greta Chiara CermisoniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mirko PozzoniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-5743
Gerarda GaetaObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Ivo CavorettoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paola ViganòInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3674-5912
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos developed in vitro requires a biopsy for obtaining cellular samples for the analysis. Signs of cell injury have been described in association with this procedure. Thus, the consequences of the biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes have been the subject of some quantitative analyses, although the reliability of data pooling may be limited by important issues in the various reports. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The present review identifies evidence for whether pregnancies conceived after embryo biopsy are associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric, neonatal, and long-term outcomes. Available evidence has been summarized considering manipulation at various stages of embryo development. SEARCH

methodsWe used the scoping review methodology. Searches of article databases were performed with keywords pertaining to the embryo biopsy technique and obstetric, neonatal, and postnatal outcomes. Studies in which embryos were biopsied at different stages (i.e. both at the cleavage and blastocyst stages) were excluded. We included data on fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The final sample of 31 documents was subjected to qualitative thematic analysis. OUTCOMES: Sound evidence is lacking to fully address the issues on the potential obstetric, neonatal or long-term consequences of embryo biopsy. For polar body biopsy, the literature is too scant to draw any conclusion. Some data, although limited and controversial, suggest a possible association of embryo biopsy at the cleavage stage with an increased risk of low birthweight and small for gestational age neonates compared to babies derived from non-biopsied embryos. An increase in preterm deliveries and birth defects in cases of trophectoderm biopsy was suggested. For both biopsy methods (at the cleavage and blastocyst stages), an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was found. However, these findings may be explained by confounders such as other embryo manipulation procedures or by intrinsic patient or population characteristics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Since there is inadequate evidence to assess obstetric, neonatal, and long-term health outcomes following embryo biopsy, an invasive PGT strategy should be developed with a cautious approach. A non-invasive approach, based on the analysis of embryo cell-free DNA, needs to be pursued to overcome the potential limitations of embryo biopsy.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisBiopsyBlastocystChildFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesblastocystembryo biopsyfollow-upmaternal outcomesneonatal outcomespreimplantation genetic testingscoping reviewtrophectoderm biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36655536
PMCPMC10152168
OpenAlexW4317436243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.