Comparing Tigertriever 13 to other thrombectomy devices for distal medium vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundThere is limited evidence on the optimal endovascular strategy for treatment of distal medium-vessel occlusions (DMVO). The low-profile Tigertriever 13 stent-triever shows early promise as an adaptable device that can navigate the distal vasculature without increasing complication risk in DMVO.MethodsUsing Nested Knowledge, we screened literature for RCTs and cohort studies on the endovascular treatment of DMVO. The primary outcome was reperfusion success, as measured by thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) ≥ 2b and secondary outcomes included rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality at 90 days, and modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 0-2 at 90 days. A random-effects model was used to compute pooled prevalence rates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsEleven studies with 1402 patients, 167 patients treated by Tigertriever 13 and 1235 patients treated by other devices, were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of reperfusion success was similar in patients treated by Tigertriever 13 (83.2% [95% CI: 71.5-96.7%]) versus other devices (81.6% [95% CI: 75.3-88.4%], p > 0.05). The rate of sICH was also similar in patients treated by Tigertriever 13 (7.2% [95% CI: 4.1-12.5%]) versus other devices (6.9% [95% CI: 5.5-8.8%]). There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of mortality and mRS.ConclusionsTigertriever 13 had similar rates of reperfusion success and sICH as other devices used for the treatment of DMVO. Heterogeneity in data element reporting prevented further analyses. Further studies evaluating Tigertriever 13 and other potential devices in DMVO should attempt to harmonize data element reporting.