Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2021
Image-Based Geometrical Characterization of Nodes in Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smooth Like Butter: Evaluating Multi-lattice Transitions in Property-Augmented Latent Spaces.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025Article
- Smoothing the Rough Edges: Evaluating Automatically Generated Multi-Lattice Transitions.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Application and planning of an energy-oriented stochastic disassembly line balancing problem.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Article
- ECG Measurement Uncertainty Based on Monte Carlo Approach: An Effective Analysis for a Successful Cardiac Health Monitoring System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Grain Growth during Selective Laser Melting of 316L Stainless Steel.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Scalable 3D-printed lattices for pressure control in fluid applications.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2021Article
- Scalable, process-oriented beam lattices: generation, characterization, and compensation for open cellular structures.Additive manufacturing · 2021Article
- FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments.Polymers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of lattice structures with optimal mechanical, fluid, and thermal properties. However, during the AM fabrication process, defects are produced in the strut and node elements, which comprise the lattice structure. This leads to discrepancies between the AM fabricated lattice and its idealized computer-aided design (CAD) model, negatively affecting the ability to predict the mechanical behavior of the fabricated lattice via numerical models. Current research is focused on quantification of geometric uncertainties in the strut elements of the lattice; as-manufactured node geometries remain relatively unexplored on an individual scale, despite their criticality to the mechanical response of the structure. Understanding the geometrical properties of as-manufactured nodes relative to CAD idealizations can be used to improve lattice designs and numerical models. In this research, X-ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) is used to analyze and quantify the as-manufactured nodal geometry, found in face-centered cubic and face-centered cubic with axial struts lattices fabricated via selective laser melting. A custom tool is developed that enables auto-isolation and classification of nodal joints from μCT-derived cross-sectional slices. Geometrical properties are extracted from the isolated nodal cross sections and compared with their idealized CAD model counterpart. Quantification of geometrical defects provides insight into how nodes within an AM lattice structure differ from each other and their idealized design. Overall, this research is an initial step toward developing accurate and efficient numerical models, as well as better node design for AM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.