Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655177›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2021

Image-Based Geometrical Characterization of Nodes in Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures.

Bill Lozanovski, David Downing, Rance Tino, Phuong Tran, Darpan Shidid, Claus Emmelmann, Ma Qian, Peter Choong, Milan Brandt, Martin Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application and planning of an energy-oriented stochastic disassembly line balancing problem.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Scalable 3D-printed lattices for pressure control in fluid applications.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bill LozanovskiRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
David DowningRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rance TinoRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Phuong TranDepartment of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Darpan ShididRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Claus EmmelmannFraunhofer Research Institution for Additive Manufacturing Technologies IAPT, Hamburg, Germany.
Ma QianRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter ChoongARC Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing, Brisbane, Australia.
Milan BrandtRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Martin LearyRMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of lattice structures with optimal mechanical, fluid, and thermal properties. However, during the AM fabrication process, defects are produced in the strut and node elements, which comprise the lattice structure. This leads to discrepancies between the AM fabricated lattice and its idealized computer-aided design (CAD) model, negatively affecting the ability to predict the mechanical behavior of the fabricated lattice via numerical models. Current research is focused on quantification of geometric uncertainties in the strut elements of the lattice; as-manufactured node geometries remain relatively unexplored on an individual scale, despite their criticality to the mechanical response of the structure. Understanding the geometrical properties of as-manufactured nodes relative to CAD idealizations can be used to improve lattice designs and numerical models. In this research, X-ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) is used to analyze and quantify the as-manufactured nodal geometry, found in face-centered cubic and face-centered cubic with axial struts lattices fabricated via selective laser melting. A custom tool is developed that enables auto-isolation and classification of nodal joints from μCT-derived cross-sectional slices. Geometrical properties are extracted from the isolated nodal cross sections and compared with their idealized CAD model counterpart. Quantification of geometrical defects provides insight into how nodes within an AM lattice structure differ from each other and their idealized design. Overall, this research is an initial step toward developing accurate and efficient numerical models, as well as better node design for AM.

Indexed as

build qualitycomputed tomographydefectslattice structuresselective laser melting

Identifiers

PMID36655177
PMCPMC9828589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.