Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655151›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Challenges for Lower-Middle-Income Countries in Achieving Universal Healthcare: An Indian Perspective.

Meenu G Sharma, Harvinder Popli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meenu G SharmaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, IND.
Harvinder PopliSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal health coverage (UHC) by 2030 is a commitment of the global community adopted as Sustainable Development Goal 3.8. UHC, as defined by WHO, means all people have access to quality health services, when and where they need them, and without financial hardship. However, low-income and lower-middle-income countries, faced with competing priorities, find themselves struggling to muster enough resources to steer towards this goal at the desired pace. India is the largest lower-middle-income country, accounting for almost 18% of the world's population. How it performs in moving towards this goal will have a significant impact on achieving UHC at a global level. India has witnessed noteworthy improvement in several health indicators and the UHC service coverage index in recent decades, but the progress on improving service capacity and access has been rather slow given the enormity of its population, scarcity of funds, grossly inadequate public infrastructure, shortage of trained workforce, disparate needs of various regions of the country, lack of healthcare system integration, changing disease demography, and slack regulatory framework. The recent push through National Health Mission aims to address some of these challenges; however, a fragmented health delivery structure ossified over decades has been slow to keep up with the requirements of the country's massive and diverse population. This paper discusses the inherent characteristics and key challenges faced by the healthcare delivery system of India in achieving UHC.

Indexed as

healthcare systemindialower middle income countriespublic healthuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID36655151
PMCPMC9839153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.