ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2023
Comprehensive narrative review on the analysis of outcomes from cell transplantation clinical trials for discogenic low back pain.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enzymatic chemonucleolysis for lumbar disc herniation-an assessment of historical and contemporary efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Restoring disc matrix homeostasis: Dual-miRNA and human platelet lysate as a novel therapeutic strategy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Dual-miRNA Mediated Stimulation of Nucleus Pulposus and Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells for Intervertebral Disc Repair.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.Neurospine · 2025Article
- Article
- A Proposed Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm for the Management of Lumbar Discogenic Pain.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- In silico modeling the potential clinical effect of growth factor treatment on the metabolism of human nucleus pulposus cells.JOR spine · 2024Article
- Assessment of Tie2-Rejuvenated Nucleus Pulposus Cell Transplants from Young and Old Patient Sources Demonstrates That Age Still Matters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Getting to the Core: Exploring the Embryonic Development from Notochord to Nucleus Pulposus.Journal of developmental biology · 2024Review
- Review
- Why clinical trials in disc regeneration strive to achieve completion: Insights from publication status and funding sources.JOR spine · 2024Article
- Article
- Perspective on Intradiscal Therapies for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: State of the Science, Knowledge Gaps, and Imperatives for Clinical Adoption.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Recombinant Laminin-511 Fragment (iMatrix-511) Coating Supports Maintenance of Human Nucleus Pulposus Progenitor Cells In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Intervertebral disc degeneration-Current therapeutic options and challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is one of the primary causes of low back pain (LBP) and despite a prominent prevalence, present treatment options remain inadequate for a large portion of LBP patients. New developments in regenerative therapeutics offer potentially powerful medical tools to modify this pathology, with specific focus on (stem) cell transplantations. Multiple clinical trials have since reported overall beneficial outcomes favoring cell therapy. Nonetheless, the significance of these improvements is often not (clearly) discussed. As such, this narrative review aims to summarize the significance of the reported improvements from human clinical trials on IVD-targeted cell therapy. Methods: Through a comprehensive narrative review we discuss the improvements in pain, disability, quality of life, and imaging modalities and reported adverse events following cell therapy for discogenic pain. Results: Most clinical trials were able to report clear and significant improvements in pain and disability outcomes. Imaging and quality of life improvements however were not as clearly reported but did present some enhancements for a select number of patients. Finally, whether cell therapy can outperform placebo treatment remains intangible. Conclusions: Our review highlights the clinical significance of observed trends in pain and disability improvement. Nevertheless, reporting quality was found unsatisfactory and large-scale randomized controlled studies remain small in number. Future studies and articles should put more emphasis on improvements in imaging modalities and compare outcomes to (placebo) control groups to fully elucidate the efficacy and safety of cellular therapeutics against LBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.