Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655046›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2023

Corrosion-influencing microorganisms in petroliferous regions on a global scale: systematic review, analysis, and scientific synthesis of 16S amplicon metagenomic studies.

Joyce Dutra, Rosimeire Gomes, Glen Jasper Yupanqui García, Danitza Xiomara Romero-Cale, Mariana Santos Cardoso, Vinicius Waldow, Claudia Groposo, Rubens N Akamine, Maira Sousa, Henrique Figueiredo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Nitratidesulfovibrio sp. and Thermodesulfomicrobium sp.: Isolated Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria From Ahvaz Oilfield in Khouzestan.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joyce DutraGraduate Program in Microbiology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rosimeire GomesGraduate Program in Microbiology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Glen Jasper Yupanqui GarcíaGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Danitza Xiomara Romero-CaleGraduate Program in Biotechnology, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
Mariana Santos CardosoGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vinicius WaldowPetrobras Research and Development Center (CENPES), Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-2922
Claudia GroposoPetrobras, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Rubens N AkaminePetrobras Research and Development Center (CENPES), Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3354-0663
Maira SousaPetrobras Research and Development Center (CENPES), Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Henrique FigueiredoVeterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vasco AzevedoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4775-2280
Aristóteles Góes-NetoInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-6243
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRPetrobras (Brazil) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the current systematic review was to evaluate the taxonomic composition and relative abundance of bacteria and archaea associated with the microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), and the prediction of their metabolic functions in different sample types from oil production and transport structures worldwide. To accomplish this goal, a total of 552 published studies on the diversity of microbial communities using 16S amplicon metagenomics in oil and gas industry facilities indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and OnePetro databases were analyzed on 10th May 2021. The selection of articles was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies that performed amplicon metagenomics to obtain the microbial composition of samples from oil fields were included. Studies that evaluated oil refineries, carried out amplicon metagenomics directly from cultures, and those that used DGGE analysis were removed. Data were thoroughly investigated using multivariate statistics by ordination analysis, bivariate statistics by correlation, and microorganisms' shareability and uniqueness analysis. Additionally, the full deposited databases of 16S rDNA sequences were obtained to perform functional prediction. A total of 69 eligible articles was included for data analysis. The results showed that the sulfidogenic, methanogenic, acid-producing, and nitrate-reducing functional groups were the most expressive, all of which can be directly involved in MIC processes. There were significant positive correlations between microorganisms in the injection water (IW), produced water (PW), and solid deposits (SD) samples, and negative correlations in the PW and SD samples. Only the PW and SD samples displayed genera common to all petroliferous regions,

Indexed as

ArchaeaMetagenomicsBacteriaCorrosionHumansWaterWaterMetabarcodingMicrobial communitiesMicrobiologically influenced corrosionOilWorldwide

Identifiers

PMID36655046
PMCPMC9841911
OpenAlexW4316039312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.