Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36655032›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Financial Models for an Academic Practice in Plastic Surgery.

Kathrina Munoz, Gregory R D Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Simple Primer on Relative Value Units for Surgeons.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  2. Reimagining Recruitment and Retention in Academic Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  3. The Anatomy of an Employment Contract.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathrina MunozDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of California, Irvine, Orange, Calif.
Gregory R D EvansDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of California, Irvine, Orange, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an attempt to investigate physician compensation in academic practice, financial reimbursement models of departments and/or divisions of plastic surgery within an academic university setting were evaluated. Method: Thirteen divisions or departments of plastic surgery were surveyed to obtain information regarding reimbursement models for plastic surgery. Results: Of the 13 plastic surgery groups surveyed, 11 were divisions within the department of surgery. The department chairs/chief and/or chief administrative officers were questioned regarding the following areas: (1) total compensation, 2) bonus and incentive compensation models, and (3) cosmetic and cash reimbursement. There were no regional differences that could be identified. As such, we grouped institutions into Western, Midwest, and Eastern regions. COVID-19 did not change any of the financial models that were established before the pandemic. Discussion: There is no ideal model for compensation, which varied among the institutions surveyed. All of these financial models were established before COVID-19 and did not significantly change with the pandemic. It appears that within this small sample size, compensation is based mainly on a $/wRVU model. Funding for research and educational teaching remains a challenge, which is not reimbursed well. Although faculty compensation may vary based on the institutions, the decision to enter and remain in academic practice includes a series of decisions. However, compensation is a significant factor, which should not be minimized.

Identifiers

PMID36655032
PMCPMC9839262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.