ReviewForensic science international. Synergy2023
Interpol review of forensic management, 2019-2022.
Review in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpol review of forensic science management, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Quality issue management and disclosure in forensic science: A survey of practice and perceptions.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Methodological support for forensic science in the USA and Ukraine: A comparative study.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Digitalisation of forensic expert activity in Ukraine: Organisational and legal framework.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Areas of modernization of the system of training and certification of forensic experts in Ukraine based on the adaptation of foreign experience.Forensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Directions for improving the financial support of forensic expert forensic activity in Ukraine with account of positive foreign experience.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper reviews and summarizes the forensic management literature from late 2019 to late 2022, covering laboratory strategic, tactical and operational decision-making, benchmarking, quality assurance, and managerial impacts from technological developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.